GGGOF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.02 (-10.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
16.82M
MAKOF
Price
$2.27
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
103.8M
Ad is loading...

GGGOF vs MAKOF

Header iconGGGOF vs MAKOF Comparison
Open Charts GGGOF vs MAKOFBanner chart's image
GOLCONDA GOLD
Price$0.18
Change-$0.02 (-10.00%)
Volume$285.76K
Capitalization16.82M
Mako Mining
Price$2.27
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.08K
Capitalization103.8M
GGGOF vs MAKOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GGGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAKOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGGOF vs. MAKOF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGGOF is a Hold and MAKOF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (GGGOF: $0.18 vs. MAKOF: $2.28)
Brand notoriety: GGGOF and MAKOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGGOF: 356% vs. MAKOF: 64%
Market capitalization -- GGGOF: $16.82M vs. MAKOF: $103.8M
GGGOF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $16.82M. MAKOF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $103.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGGOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAKOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GGGOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAKOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAKOF is a better buy in the long-term than GGGOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGGOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAKOF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GGGOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MAKOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GGGOF is a better buy in the short-term than MAKOF.

Price Growth

GGGOF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -14.29% price change this week, while MAKOF (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAKOF($104M) has a higher market cap than GGGOF($16.8M). MAKOF has higher P/E ratio than GGGOF: MAKOF (24.69) vs GGGOF (3.24). MAKOF YTD gains are higher at: 3.175 vs. GGGOF (-18.182). MAKOF has more cash in the bank: 1.48M vs. GGGOF (414K). GGGOF has less debt than MAKOF: GGGOF (1.14M) vs MAKOF (16.2M).
GGGOFMAKOFGGGOF / MAKOF
Capitalization16.8M104M16%
EBITDA-40.76KN/A-
Gain YTD-18.1823.175-573%
P/E Ratio3.2424.6913%
Revenue3.56MN/A-
Total Cash414K1.48M28%
Total Debt1.14M16.2M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGGOF vs MAKOF: Fundamental Ratings
GGGOF
MAKOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10086
SMR RATING
1..100
9217
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4945
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10099
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GGGOF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as MAKOF (58). This means that GGGOF’s stock grew similarly to MAKOF’s over the last 12 months.

MAKOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as GGGOF (100). This means that MAKOF’s stock grew similarly to GGGOF’s over the last 12 months.

MAKOF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GGGOF (92). This means that MAKOF’s stock grew significantly faster than GGGOF’s over the last 12 months.

MAKOF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as GGGOF (49). This means that MAKOF’s stock grew similarly to GGGOF’s over the last 12 months.

MAKOF's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as GGGOF (100). This means that MAKOF’s stock grew similarly to GGGOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGGOFMAKOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GGGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAKOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BNRG1.800.04
+2.27%
Brenmiller Energy Ltd
VINP9.760.08
+0.83%
Vinci Partners Investments Ltd
TFII134.23-1.16
-0.86%
TFI International
PRCT76.02-2.82
-3.58%
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp
CXAI1.79-0.10
-5.29%
CXApp

GGGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGGOF and THM have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGGOF and THM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGGOF
1D Price
Change %
GGGOF100%
-7.83%
THM - GGGOF
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.73%
MAKOF - GGGOF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
OMGGF - GGGOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+9.52%
SGLDF - GGGOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NFGC - GGGOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
More

MAKOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAKOF and PAAS have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAKOF and PAAS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAKOF
1D Price
Change %
MAKOF100%
-0.22%
PAAS - MAKOF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
EQX - MAKOF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
AG - MAKOF
29%
Poorly correlated
+5.04%
AU - MAKOF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
SBSW - MAKOF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.94%
More