GGGOF
Price
$1.24
Change
-$0.05 (-3.88%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
87.93M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OMGGF
Price
$0.88
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
549.2M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GGGOF vs OMGGF

Header iconGGGOF vs OMGGF Comparison
Open Charts GGGOF vs OMGGFBanner chart's image
GOLCONDA GOLD
Price$1.24
Change-$0.05 (-3.88%)
Volume$93.64K
Capitalization87.93M
OMAI GOLD MINES
Price$0.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$43.03K
Capitalization549.2M
GGGOF vs OMGGF Comparison Chart in %
GGGOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OMGGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGGOF vs. OMGGF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGGOF is a Hold and OMGGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (GGGOF: $1.24 vs. OMGGF: $0.88)
Brand notoriety: GGGOF and OMGGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGGOF: 56% vs. OMGGF: 33%
Market capitalization -- GGGOF: $90.38M vs. OMGGF: $569.73M
GGGOF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $90.38M. OMGGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $569.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $109.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGGOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOMGGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GGGOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OMGGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMGGF is a better buy in the long-term than GGGOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGGOF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMGGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GGGOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OMGGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMGGF is a better buy in the short-term than GGGOF.

Price Growth

GGGOF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -10.79% price change this week, while OMGGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +11.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +68.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-0.08% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMGGF($549M) has a higher market cap than GGGOF($87.9M). GGGOF YTD gains are higher at: 463.636 vs. OMGGF (411.835). GGGOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.11M vs. OMGGF (-10.22M). OMGGF has more cash in the bank: 18.6M vs. GGGOF (1.09M). GGGOF has higher revenues than OMGGF: GGGOF (22.9M) vs OMGGF (0).
GGGOFOMGGFGGGOF / OMGGF
Capitalization87.9M549M16%
EBITDA7.11M-10.22M-70%
Gain YTD463.636411.835113%
P/E Ratio24.80N/A-
Revenue22.9M0-
Total Cash1.09M18.6M6%
Total Debt2.46MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGGOF vs OMGGF: Fundamental Ratings
GGGOF
OMGGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5581
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
736
SMR RATING
1..100
5697
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3434
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9148
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5081

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GGGOF's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as OMGGF (85). This means that GGGOF’s stock grew similarly to OMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

OMGGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GGGOF (73). This means that OMGGF’s stock grew significantly faster than GGGOF’s over the last 12 months.

GGGOF's SMR Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OMGGF (97). This means that GGGOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

GGGOF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as OMGGF (34). This means that GGGOF’s stock grew similarly to OMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

OMGGF's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGGOF (91). This means that OMGGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGGOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGGOFOMGGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GGGOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OMGGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGUCY4.50N/A
N/A
Prosegur Cash
PNPL0.11N/A
N/A
Pineapple, Inc.
SWZCF754.98N/A
N/A
Swisscom AG
OZFRY1.89N/A
N/A
OFX Group Limited
HCXLY36.25N/A
N/A
Hiscox, Ltd.

GGGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGGOF and THM have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGGOF and THM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGGOF
1D Price
Change %
GGGOF100%
-3.88%
THM - GGGOF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
MAKOF - GGGOF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
OMGGF - GGGOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
NFGC - GGGOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.76%
GFI - GGGOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
More

OMGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMGGF and FDMIF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMGGF and FDMIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMGGF
1D Price
Change %
OMGGF100%
+0.58%
FDMIF - OMGGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.61%
GGGOF - OMGGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.88%
SMAGF - OMGGF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.38%
EOGSF - OMGGF
2%
Poorly correlated
-9.46%
RNDXF - OMGGF
0%
Poorly correlated
+156.57%