Ad is loading...
GGGPX vs RWEBX
GGGPX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GGGPX vs RWEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core P
Price$35.48
Change+$0.09 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$58.11
Change-$0.13 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets177.38B
GGGPX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGGPX vs. RWEBX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGGPX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 177B vs. GGGPX (1.18B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GGGPX: RWEBX (0.83) vs GGGPX (0.52). GGGPX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GGGPX (7 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than GGGPX (0.76). GGGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWEBX (31.00). GGGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: GGGPX (0) vs RWEBX (250). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.97 vs. GGGPX (-5.33). RWEBX (45.39) and GGGPX (44.02) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GGGPX | RWEBX | GGGPX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.06 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.06 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.631 | -4.575 | 232% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 177B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.83 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.33 | -0.97 | 551% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.04 | 2.61 | 231% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.02 | 45.39 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 47.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...