Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGGPX vs RWEBX
GGGPX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GGGPX vs RWEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity P
Price$42.64
Change+$0.02 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.37B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$64.08
Change-$0.13 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets201.64B
GGGPX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGGPX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGGPX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 202B vs. GGGPX (1.37B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GGGPX: RWEBX (0.80) vs GGGPX (0.47). GGGPX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GGGPX (7 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than GGGPX (0.76). GGGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). GGGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: GGGPX (0) vs RWEBX (250). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.74 vs. GGGPX (5.12). GGGPX return over 5 years is better than : 51.99 vs. RWEBX (48.13).
| GGGPX | RWEBX | GGGPX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.06 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.06 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.677 | 5.204 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.37B | 202B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.80 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.12 | 5.74 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.26 | 27.82 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.99 | 48.13 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement