Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGGPX vs RWEBX
GGGPX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GGGPX vs RWEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity P
Price$41.58
Change+$0.33 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.33B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$62.78
Change+$0.54 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.28B
GGGPX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGGPX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGGPX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 196B vs. GGGPX (1.33B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GGGPX: RWEBX (0.80) vs GGGPX (0.49). GGGPX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GGGPX (7 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than GGGPX (0.76). GGGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWEBX (31.00). GGGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: GGGPX (0) vs RWEBX (250). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.52 vs. GGGPX (2.88). GGGPX return over 5 years is better than : 57.88 vs. RWEBX (54.14).
| GGGPX | RWEBX | GGGPX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.06 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.06 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.167 | 3.070 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.33B | 196B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.80 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.88 | 5.52 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.77 | 25.37 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.88 | 54.14 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.63 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement