GGGSF
Price
$25.16
Change
+$2.46 (+10.84%)
Updated
Apr 16 closing price
Capitalization
2.79B
HDALF
Price
$1.86
Change
-$0.04 (-2.11%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
10.27B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GGGSF vs HDALF

Header iconGGGSF vs HDALF Comparison
Open Charts GGGSF vs HDALFBanner chart's image
Greggs
Price$25.16
Change+$2.46 (+10.84%)
Volume$226
Capitalization2.79B
Haidilao International
Price$1.86
Change-$0.04 (-2.11%)
Volume$80.5K
Capitalization10.27B
GGGSF vs HDALF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGGSF vs. HDALF commentary
Jun 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGGSF is a Hold and HDALF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2025
Stock price -- (GGGSF: $25.16 vs. HDALF: $1.86)
Brand notoriety: GGGSF and HDALF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGGSF: 46% vs. HDALF: 787%
Market capitalization -- GGGSF: $2.79B vs. HDALF: $10.27B
GGGSF [@Restaurants] is valued at $2.79B. HDALF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $10.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $223.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGGSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHDALF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GGGSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HDALF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GGGSF and HDALF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

GGGSF (@Restaurants) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HDALF (@Restaurants) price change was -4.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.43%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.64% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HDALF($10.3B) has a higher market cap than GGGSF($2.79B). HDALF has higher P/E ratio than GGGSF: HDALF (15.40) vs GGGSF (12.49). HDALF YTD gains are higher at: -15.455 vs. GGGSF (-26.984).
GGGSFHDALFGGGSF / HDALF
Capitalization2.79B10.3B27%
EBITDA326MN/A-
Gain YTD-26.984-15.455175%
P/E Ratio12.4915.4081%
Revenue1.93BN/A-
Total Cash142MN/A-
Total Debt327MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGGSF vs HDALF: Fundamental Ratings
GGGSF
HDALF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4564
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7881
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HDALF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as GGGSF (14). This means that HDALF’s stock grew similarly to GGGSF’s over the last 12 months.

GGGSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as HDALF (100). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew similarly to HDALF’s over the last 12 months.

GGGSF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HDALF (100). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew similarly to HDALF’s over the last 12 months.

GGGSF's Price Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as HDALF (81). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew similarly to HDALF’s over the last 12 months.

GGGSF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HDALF (100). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew similarly to HDALF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYOFX13.060.30
+2.35%
Royce Small-Cap Opportunity Svc
ISCWX90.79N/A
N/A
Voya Multi-Manager International Sm Cp W
LBSAX34.00N/A
N/A
Columbia Dividend Income A
TORCX18.53N/A
N/A
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure TR C
ALGZX19.11N/A
N/A
Alger Responsible Investing Z

GGGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGGSF and KRIUF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGGSF and KRIUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGGSF
1D Price
Change %
GGGSF100%
N/A
KRIUF - GGGSF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLFFF - GGGSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JBFCF - GGGSF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.65%
DMPZF - GGGSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPZUF - GGGSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More