Ad is loading...
GGHCX vs SHSAX
GGHCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGHCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGHCX is a Buy and SHSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.45B vs. GGHCX (1.13B). SHSAX pays higher dividends than GGHCX: SHSAX (0.21) vs GGHCX (0.00). GGHCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: GGHCX (36 years) vs SHSAX (25 years). SHSAX (1.09) and GGHCX (1.06) have similar cost to investors . GGHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. SHSAX (27.00). GGHCX (6%) and SHSAX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. GGHCX (1000) and SHSAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GGHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.77 vs. SHSAX (-15.09). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -3.19 vs. GGHCX (-9.33).
| GGHCX | SHSAX | GGHCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.09 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.09 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.652 | -6.182 | 75% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 6.45B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.77 | -15.09 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.40 | -20.07 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.33 | -3.19 | 292% |
| Returns for 10 years | -29.41 | 7.78 | -378% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...