Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGHCX vs SHSAX
GGHCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGHCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGHCX is a Buy and SHSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.32B vs. GGHCX (1.22B). SHSAX pays higher dividends than GGHCX: SHSAX (0.22) vs GGHCX (0.00). GGHCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: GGHCX (36 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). SHSAX (1.09) and GGHCX (1.05) have similar cost to investors . GGHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. SHSAX (43.00). GGHCX (6%) and SHSAX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. GGHCX (1000) and SHSAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GGHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.68 vs. SHSAX (-11.48). GGHCX return over 5 years is better than : -13.20 vs. SHSAX (-14.51).
| GGHCX | SHSAX | GGHCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.09 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.09 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.727 | 0.288 | 3,374% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.22B | 6.32B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.68 | -11.48 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.78 | 6.05 | 360% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.20 | -14.51 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.81 | 23.96 | -33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement