Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGHCX vs SHSAX
GGHCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGHCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGHCX is a Buy and SHSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.23B vs. GGHCX (1.2B). SHSAX pays higher dividends than GGHCX: SHSAX (0.23) vs GGHCX (0.00). GGHCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: GGHCX (36 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). SHSAX (1.09) and GGHCX (1.05) have similar cost to investors . GGHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. SHSAX (43.00). GGHCX (6%) and SHSAX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. GGHCX (1000) and SHSAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GGHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.22 vs. SHSAX (-16.65). GGHCX return over 5 years is better than : -9.85 vs. SHSAX (-13.76).
| GGHCX | SHSAX | GGHCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.09 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.09 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.823 | -4.020 | -170% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 6.23B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.22 | -16.65 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.69 | -0.08 | -19,765% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.85 | -13.76 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.37 | 11.53 | -159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement