GGLDF
Price
$0.28
Change
-$0.01 (-3.45%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
54.03M
GLBKF
Price
$0.25
Change
+$0.10 (+66.67%)
Updated
Jul 29 closing price
Capitalization
52.73M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GGLDF vs GLBKF

Header iconGGLDF vs GLBKF Comparison
Open Charts GGLDF vs GLBKFBanner chart's image
Getchell Gold
Price$0.28
Change-$0.01 (-3.45%)
Volume$101.47K
Capitalization54.03M
Goldbank Mining
Price$0.25
Change+$0.10 (+66.67%)
Volume$100
Capitalization52.73M
GGLDF vs GLBKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGLDF vs. GLBKF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGLDF is a Buy and GLBKF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GGLDF: $0.28 vs. GLBKF: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: GGLDF and GLBKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGLDF: 87% vs. GLBKF: 100%
Market capitalization -- GGLDF: $54.03M vs. GLBKF: $52.73M
GGLDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $54.03M. GLBKF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $52.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGLDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGLBKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GGLDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GLBKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLBKF is a better buy in the long-term than GGLDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGLDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GGLDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

GGLDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +10.13% price change this week, while GLBKF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3316.97%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.27% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GGLDF($54M) and GLBKF($52.7M) have the same market capitalization . GGLDF YTD gains are higher at: 191.877 vs. GLBKF (64.055). GLBKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -258.21K vs. GGLDF (-2.65M). GGLDF has more cash in the bank: 793K vs. GLBKF (198K). GLBKF has less debt than GGLDF: GLBKF (185K) vs GGLDF (3.79M). GGLDF (0) and GLBKF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GGLDFGLBKFGGLDF / GLBKF
Capitalization54M52.7M102%
EBITDA-2.65M-258.21K1,028%
Gain YTD191.87764.055300%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash793K198K401%
Total Debt3.79M185K2,049%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGLDF vs GLBKF: Fundamental Ratings
GGLDF
GLBKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1327
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9713
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3536
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLBKF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GGLDF (87). This means that GLBKF’s stock grew significantly faster than GGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

GLBKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GGLDF (97). This means that GLBKF’s stock grew significantly faster than GGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

GLBKF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GGLDF (100). This means that GLBKF’s stock grew similarly to GGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

GGLDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as GLBKF (36). This means that GGLDF’s stock grew similarly to GLBKF’s over the last 12 months.

GGLDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GLBKF (100). This means that GGLDF’s stock grew similarly to GLBKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGLDFGLBKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NOKBF4.21N/A
N/A
Nokia Corp.
ONXXF7.41N/A
N/A
Ontex Group NV
WEEEF1.51N/A
N/A
Western Energy Services Corp.
WNDLF94.81N/A
N/A
Wendel
GRDAF0.05N/A
-5.65%
Grounded Lithium Corp

GGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGLDF has been loosely correlated with CALRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GGLDF jumps, then CALRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGLDF
1D Price
Change %
GGLDF100%
-1.22%
CALRF - GGLDF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GAU - GGLDF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
THM - GGLDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
PAAS - GGLDF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
KGC - GGLDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
More

GLBKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLBKF has been loosely correlated with STBMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLBKF jumps, then STBMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLBKF
1D Price
Change %
GLBKF100%
N/A
STBMF - GLBKF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RMLRF - GLBKF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
GNSMF - GLBKF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRBIF - GLBKF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.61%
GGLDF - GLBKF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
More