GGLDF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
19.24M
PAAS
Price
$28.45
Change
+$1.86 (+7.00%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:34 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.59B
62 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GGLDF vs PAAS

Header iconGGLDF vs PAAS Comparison
Open Charts GGLDF vs PAASBanner chart's image
Getchell Gold
Price$0.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$244.08K
Capitalization19.24M
Pan American Silver
Price$28.45
Change+$1.86 (+7.00%)
Volume$16.03K
Capitalization5.59B
GGLDF vs PAAS Comparison Chart
Loading...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGLDF vs. PAAS commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGLDF is a Hold and PAAS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (GGLDF: $0.18 vs. PAAS: $26.59)
Brand notoriety: GGLDF: Not notable vs. PAAS: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGLDF: 306% vs. PAAS: 97%
Market capitalization -- GGLDF: $19.24M vs. PAAS: $5.59B
GGLDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $19.24M. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGLDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GGLDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the long-term than GGLDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAAS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PAAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

GGLDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.24% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was +9.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($5.59B) has a higher market cap than GGLDF($19.2M). GGLDF YTD gains are higher at: 80.000 vs. PAAS (32.630). PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 296M vs. GGLDF (-6.98M). PAAS has higher revenues than GGLDF: PAAS (2.02B) vs GGLDF (0).
GGLDFPAASGGLDF / PAAS
Capitalization19.2M5.59B0%
EBITDA-6.98M296M-2%
Gain YTD80.00032.630245%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue02.02B-
Total Cash841KN/A-
Total Debt90KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGLDF vs PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
GGLDF
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1519
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9974
SMR RATING
1..100
9880
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3843
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10097
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAAS's Valuation (15) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for GGLDF (88) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew significantly faster than GGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GGLDF (99) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to GGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's SMR Rating (80) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GGLDF (98) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to GGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

GGLDF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (43) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that GGLDF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GGLDF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to GGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDG75.860.58
+0.77%
iShares MSCI Global Sust Dev Goals ETF
RWR97.640.08
+0.08%
SPDR® Dow Jones® REIT ETF
TMDV47.29N/A
N/A
ProShares Russell US Dividend Grwr ETF
BSTP33.74N/A
N/A
Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF
FDMO73.10-0.05
-0.07%
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF

GGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGLDF has been loosely correlated with CALRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GGLDF jumps, then CALRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGLDF
1D Price
Change %
GGLDF100%
+0.06%
CALRF - GGLDF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GAU - GGLDF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THM - GGLDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.31%
PAAS - GGLDF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
KGC - GGLDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
More

PAAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAAS has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAAS jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAAS
1D Price
Change %
PAAS100%
+1.26%
AEM - PAAS
83%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
WPM - PAAS
81%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
MAG - PAAS
78%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
KGC - PAAS
78%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
HL - PAAS
77%
Closely correlated
+5.89%
More