Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGRAX vs RGABX
GGRAX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts GGRAX vs RGABX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth A
Price$8.87
Change+$0.02 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.44M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$75.99
Change-$0.53 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
GGRAX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGRAX vs. RGABX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGRAX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. GGRAX (172M). GGRAX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . GGRAX was incepted earlier than RGABX: GGRAX (27 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than GGRAX (1.32). GGRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGRAX: RGABX (250) vs GGRAX (1000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.42 vs. GGRAX (-19.22). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 25.42 vs. GGRAX (-21.92).
| GGRAX | RGABX | GGRAX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.39 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.39 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.083 | 14.408 | -112% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172M | 330B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.22 | 5.42 | -354% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.90 | 55.94 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.92 | 25.42 | -86% |
| Returns for 10 years | -29.40 | 73.22 | -40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement