Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGRAX vs RGAFX
GGRAX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts GGRAX vs RGAFX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth A
Price$12.11
Change-$0.06 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.76M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$88.07
Change-$0.43 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
GGRAX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGRAX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGRAX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. GGRAX (199M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than GGRAX: RGAFX (0.55) vs GGRAX (0.00). GGRAX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: GGRAX (26 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). GGRAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). GGRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGRAX: RGAFX (250) vs GGRAX (1000). GGRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.73 vs. RGAFX (17.13). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.03 vs. GGRAX (16.68).
| GGRAX | RGAFX | GGRAX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.34 | 303% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.34 | 388% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.137 | 18.342 | 83% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 199M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.55 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.73 | 17.13 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.63 | 63.63 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.68 | 50.03 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.30 | 106.58 | 2% |