Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGRAX vs RGEBX
GGRAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts GGRAX vs RGEBX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth A
Price$8.87
Change+$0.02 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.44M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$82.38
Change+$0.43 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
GGRAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGRAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGRAX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. GGRAX (172M). GGRAX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . GGRAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: GGRAX (27 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). GGRAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). GGRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGRAX: RGEBX (250) vs GGRAX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.15 vs. GGRAX (-20.23). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 30.81 vs. GGRAX (-21.23).
| GGRAX | RGEBX | GGRAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.09 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.09 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.083 | 15.314 | -105% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172M | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.23 | 6.15 | -329% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.90 | 60.18 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.23 | 30.81 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | -29.40 | 81.54 | -36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement