Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGRAX vs RGEBX
GGRAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts GGRAX vs RGEBX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth A
Price$11.80
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets200.62M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$81.46
Change-$0.03 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.41B
GGRAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGRAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGRAX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. GGRAX (201M). GGRAX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . GGRAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: GGRAX (26 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). GGRAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). GGRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGRAX: RGEBX (250) vs GGRAX (1000). GGRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.29 vs. RGEBX (16.27). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.75 vs. GGRAX (13.28).
| GGRAX | RGEBX | GGRAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.09 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.09 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.353 | 14.026 | 81% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 201M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.29 | 16.27 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.25 | 40.38 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.28 | 40.75 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.47 | 79.00 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement