Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGRCX vs RGACX
GGRCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GGRCX vs RGACX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth C
Price$16.38
Change-$0.04 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.86M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
GGRCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGRCX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGRCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. GGRCX (200M). RGACX pays higher dividends than GGRCX: RGACX (0.07) vs GGRCX (0.00). GGRCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GGRCX (26 years) vs RGACX (23 years). GGRCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). GGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGRCX: RGACX (250) vs GGRCX (1000). GGRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.13 vs. RGACX (14.08). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. GGRCX (-10.71).
| GGRCX | RGACX | GGRCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.94 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.94 | 220% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.247 | 14.044 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 200M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.13 | 14.08 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.51 | 41.19 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.71 | 41.95 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | -49.04 | 83.68 | -59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement