Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGRCX vs RGACX
GGRCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GGRCX vs RGACX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth C
Price$13.73
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.44M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.12
Change+$0.43 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
GGRCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGRCX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGRCX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. GGRCX (172M). RGACX pays higher dividends than GGRCX: RGACX (0.07) vs GGRCX (0.00). GGRCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GGRCX (27 years) vs RGACX (24 years). GGRCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). GGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGRCX: RGACX (250) vs GGRCX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.37 vs. GGRCX (-9.67). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.00 vs. GGRCX (-31.07).
| GGRCX | RGACX | GGRCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.94 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.94 | 220% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.978 | 15.460 | -45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172M | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.67 | 6.37 | -152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.61 | 61.11 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.07 | 32.00 | -97% |
| Returns for 10 years | -57.39 | 85.80 | -67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers