Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGRCX vs RGACX
GGRCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GGRCX vs RGACX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth C
Price$16.59
Change+$0.12 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets194.1M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
GGRCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGRCX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGRCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. GGRCX (194M). RGACX pays higher dividends than GGRCX: RGACX (0.07) vs GGRCX (0.00). GGRCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GGRCX (26 years) vs RGACX (23 years). GGRCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). GGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGRCX: RGACX (250) vs GGRCX (1000). GGRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.93 vs. RGACX (20.39). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.73 vs. GGRCX (-13.00).
| GGRCX | RGACX | GGRCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.94 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.94 | 220% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.585 | 15.516 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 194M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.93 | 20.39 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.14 | 50.71 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.00 | 41.73 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | -46.12 | 96.02 | -48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement