Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGRCX vs RGAEX
GGRCX vs RGAEX Comparison
Open Charts GGRCX vs RGAEX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth C
Price$13.73
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.44M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R4
Price$85.11
Change+$0.44 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
GGRCX vs RGAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGRCX vs. RGAEX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGRCX is a Hold and RGAEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAEX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. GGRCX (172M). RGAEX pays higher dividends than GGRCX: RGAEX (0.29) vs GGRCX (0.00). GGRCX was incepted earlier than RGAEX: GGRCX (27 years) vs RGAEX (23 years). GGRCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than RGAEX (0.64). GGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGAEX (25.00). RGAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGRCX: RGAEX (250) vs GGRCX (1000). RGAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.85 vs. GGRCX (-9.67). RGAEX return over 5 years is better than : 34.04 vs. GGRCX (-31.07).
| GGRCX | RGAEX | GGRCX / RGAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.64 | 278% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.64 | 323% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.978 | 15.764 | -44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172M | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.29 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.67 | 6.85 | -141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.61 | 62.69 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.07 | 34.04 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | -57.39 | 89.12 | -64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers