Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGRCX vs RGEBX
GGRCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts GGRCX vs RGEBX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth C
Price$16.38
Change-$0.04 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.86M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$81.40
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
GGRCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGRCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGRCX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. GGRCX (200M). GGRCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . GGRCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: GGRCX (26 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). GGRCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). GGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGRCX: RGEBX (250) vs GGRCX (1000). GGRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.13 vs. RGEBX (13.85). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.64 vs. GGRCX (-10.71).
| GGRCX | RGEBX | GGRCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.09 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 1.09 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.247 | 13.942 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 200M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.13 | 13.85 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.51 | 40.38 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.71 | 40.64 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | -49.04 | 79.50 | -62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement