Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGRUX vs RGEBX
GGRUX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts GGRUX vs RGEBX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth R6
Price$12.32
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.44M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$82.38
Change+$0.43 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
GGRUX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGRUX vs. RGEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGRUX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. GGRUX (172M). GGRUX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . GGRUX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: GGRUX (10 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than GGRUX (0.95). GGRUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGRUX: RGEBX (250) vs GGRUX (5000000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.15 vs. GGRUX (-11.62). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 30.81 vs. GGRUX (-4.48).
| GGRUX | RGEBX | GGRUX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.09 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.09 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.605 | 15.314 | -56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172M | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.62 | 6.15 | -189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.62 | 60.18 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.48 | 30.81 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.58 | 81.54 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement