Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGRW vs XLK
GGRW vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts GGRW vs XLK
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF
Price$32.31
Change+$0.14 (+0.44%)
Volume$250
Net Assets6.25M
The Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$238.35
Change+$2.22 (+0.94%)
Volume$26.56K
Net Assets73.85B
GGRW vs XLK Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGRW vs. XLK commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGRW is a Buy and XLK is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 73.8B vs. GGRW (6.25M). GGRW has a higher annual dividend yield than XLK: GGRW (7.471) vs XLK (1.731). GGRW was incepted earlier than XLK: GGRW (4 years) vs XLK (26 years). GGRW (0.00) has a lower expense ratio than XLK (0.08). GGRW has a higher turnover XLK (19.00) vs XLK (19.00).
| GGRW | XLK | GGRW / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | 7.471 | 1.731 | 432% |
| Net Assets | 6.25M | 73.8B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Turnover | 45.00 | 19.00 | 237% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.67 | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| XLK | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GGRW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGRW has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GGRW jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GGRW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GGRW | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| NVDA - GGRW | 77% Closely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| ETN - GGRW | 75% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| META - GGRW | 72% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| CDNS - GGRW | 70% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| AMZN - GGRW | 69% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
More | ||||
XLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| LRCX - XLK | 83% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| KLAC - XLK | 82% Closely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| MPWR - XLK | 81% Closely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| CDNS - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| AMAT - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | +1.40% | ||
More | ||||