| GGT | IWF | GGT / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 10.453 | 2.933 | 356% |
| Net Assets | 140M | 125B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.18 | 944% |
| Turnover | 10.00 | 16.00 | 63% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 26 years | - |
| GGT | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 86% | 13 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HAKY | 31.48 | 2.08 | +7.09% |
| Amplify HACK Cybersecurity Cov Cll ETF | |||
| SDEM | 34.03 | N/A | +0.01% |
| Global X MSCI SuperDividend® Em Mkts ETF | |||
| FSMB | 19.75 | N/A | N/A |
| First Trust Short Dur Mgd Muncpl ETF | |||
| QYLG | 29.57 | -0.14 | -0.47% |
| Global X Nasdaq 100® Covered Call&Gr ETF | |||
| CGXU | 34.32 | -1.00 | -2.83% |
| Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that GGT and META have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGT and META's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GGT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GGT | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| META - GGT | 8% Poorly correlated | +2.71% | ||
| SONY - GGT | 6% Poorly correlated | +2.38% | ||
| AMT - GGT | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
| RCI - GGT | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.22% | ||
| VIV - GGT | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.34% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.83% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -3.56% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -4.01% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +1.97% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -6.39% | ||
More | ||||