Ad is loading...
GGTHF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
NLIBF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

GGTHF vs NLIBF

Header iconGGTHF vs NLIBF Comparison
Open Charts GGTHF vs NLIBFBanner chart's image
Golden Goliath Resources
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.52K
CapitalizationN/A
NOA LITHIUM BRINES
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$49.56K
CapitalizationN/A
GGTHF vs NLIBF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGTHF vs. NLIBF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGTHF is a Hold and NLIBF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (GGTHF: $0.04 vs. NLIBF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: GGTHF and NLIBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGTHF: 303% vs. NLIBF: 206%
Market capitalization -- GGTHF: $1.71M vs. NLIBF: $39.06M
GGTHF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.71M. NLIBF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $39.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGTHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNLIBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GGTHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NLIBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GGTHF and NLIBF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

GGTHF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +16.28% price change this week, while NLIBF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +8.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLIBF($39.1M) has a higher market cap than GGTHF($1.71M). GGTHF YTD gains are higher at: -45.820 vs. NLIBF (-61.798). NLIBF has more cash in the bank: 3.88M vs. GGTHF (430K).
GGTHFNLIBFGGTHF / NLIBF
Capitalization1.71M39.1M4%
EBITDA-538.82KN/A-
Gain YTD-45.820-61.79874%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash430K3.88M11%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGTHF: Fundamental Ratings
GGTHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
66
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MANA.X0.4337670.087155
+25.14%
Decentraland cryptocurrency
TRB.X72.1054102.641289
+3.80%
Tellor cryptocurrency
PTEU25.45-0.05
-0.20%
Pacer Trendpilot™ European ETF
STXG42.64-0.77
-1.77%
Strive 1000 Growth ETF
CHAU15.64-0.36
-2.25%
Direxion Dly CSI 300 CHN A Shr Bl 2X ETF

GGTHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGTHF and BKIRF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGTHF and BKIRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGTHF
1D Price
Change %
GGTHF100%
N/A
BKIRF - GGTHF
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.79%
LZM - GGTHF
11%
Poorly correlated
-5.35%
DTWOF - GGTHF
9%
Poorly correlated
-16.46%
BLIDF - GGTHF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NLIBF - GGTHF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NLIBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NLIBF has been loosely correlated with SCCFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NLIBF jumps, then SCCFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NLIBF
1D Price
Change %
NLIBF100%
N/A
SCCFF - NLIBF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DUVNF - NLIBF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMMYY - NLIBF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
BSRUF - NLIBF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ILKAF - NLIBF
23%
Poorly correlated
-10.60%
More