GGXXF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
1.63M
GLBKF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.07 (-31.82%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
44.01M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GGXXF vs GLBKF

Header iconGGXXF vs GLBKF Comparison
Open Charts GGXXF vs GLBKFBanner chart's image
GGX Gold
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization1.63M
Goldbank Mining
Price$0.15
Change-$0.07 (-31.82%)
Volume$100
Capitalization44.01M
GGXXF vs GLBKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GGXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGXXF vs. GLBKF commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGXXF is a Buy and GLBKF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (GGXXF: $0.02 vs. GLBKF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: GGXXF and GLBKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGXXF: 206% vs. GLBKF: 100%
Market capitalization -- GGXXF: $1.63M vs. GLBKF: $44.01M
GGXXF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.63M. GLBKF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $44.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGXXF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGLBKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GGXXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GLBKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GGXXF is a better buy in the long-term than GLBKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGXXF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GGXXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

GGXXF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.51% price change this week, while GLBKF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.41%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.74% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLBKF($44M) has a higher market cap than GGXXF($1.63M). GGXXF YTD gains are higher at: 105.273 vs. GLBKF (0.000). GLBKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -227.64K vs. GGXXF (-554.32K). GLBKF has more cash in the bank: 370K vs. GGXXF (664). GLBKF has less debt than GGXXF: GLBKF (228K) vs GGXXF (579K). GGXXF (0) and GLBKF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GGXXFGLBKFGGXXF / GLBKF
Capitalization1.63M44M4%
EBITDA-554.32K-227.64K244%
Gain YTD105.2730.000-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash664370K0%
Total Debt579K228K254%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGXXF vs GLBKF: Fundamental Ratings
GGXXF
GLBKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3611
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10033
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3872
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5045

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GGXXF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as GLBKF (20). This means that GGXXF’s stock grew similarly to GLBKF’s over the last 12 months.

GLBKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GGXXF (100). This means that GLBKF’s stock grew significantly faster than GGXXF’s over the last 12 months.

GLBKF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GGXXF (100). This means that GLBKF’s stock grew similarly to GGXXF’s over the last 12 months.

GGXXF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLBKF (72). This means that GGXXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLBKF’s over the last 12 months.

GGXXF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLBKF (100). This means that GGXXF’s stock grew significantly faster than GLBKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGXXFGLBKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GGXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OMGAQ0.04N/A
+7.18%
Omega Therapeutics, Inc.
APAJF5.34N/A
N/A
APA Group Stapled Security
SHIHF0.22N/A
N/A
SHENZHEN INVT HLDGS BAY AREA DEV CO LTD.
SPSAF221.00N/A
N/A
SOPRA SA
LVPR5.40N/A
N/A
Lightstone Value Plus REIT II Inc

GGXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGXXF and FPVTF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGXXF and FPVTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGXXF
1D Price
Change %
GGXXF100%
N/A
FPVTF - GGXXF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLBKF - GGXXF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GFGSF - GGXXF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
GGLXF - GGXXF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GFKRF - GGXXF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GLBKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLBKF has been loosely correlated with STBMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLBKF jumps, then STBMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLBKF
1D Price
Change %
GLBKF100%
N/A
STBMF - GLBKF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RMLRF - GLBKF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GNSMF - GLBKF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRBIF - GLBKF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGLDF - GLBKF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.40%
More