GGXXF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.17M
GLBKF
Price
$0.25
Change
+$0.10 (+66.67%)
Updated
Jul 29 closing price
Capitalization
69.05M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GGXXF vs GLBKF

Header iconGGXXF vs GLBKF Comparison
Open Charts GGXXF vs GLBKFBanner chart's image
GGX Gold
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization1.17M
Goldbank Mining
Price$0.25
Change+$0.10 (+66.67%)
Volume$100
Capitalization69.05M
GGXXF vs GLBKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GGXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGXXF vs. GLBKF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGXXF is a Hold and GLBKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GGXXF: $0.03 vs. GLBKF: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: GGXXF and GLBKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGXXF: 334% vs. GLBKF: 100%
Market capitalization -- GGXXF: $1.17M vs. GLBKF: $69.05M
GGXXF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.17M. GLBKF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $69.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGXXF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGLBKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GGXXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GLBKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GGXXF and GLBKF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGXXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GGXXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

GGXXF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GLBKF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +32.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6088.40%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.09% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLBKF($69M) has a higher market cap than GGXXF($1.18M). GGXXF YTD gains are higher at: 190.909 vs. GLBKF (64.055). GGXXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 803K vs. GLBKF (-223.56K). GLBKF has more cash in the bank: 191K vs. GGXXF (76). GGXXF has less debt than GLBKF: GGXXF (121K) vs GLBKF (186K). GGXXF (0) and GLBKF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GGXXFGLBKFGGXXF / GLBKF
Capitalization1.18M69M2%
EBITDA803K-223.56K-359%
Gain YTD190.90964.055298%
P/E Ratio2.22N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash76191K0%
Total Debt121K186K65%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGXXF vs GLBKF: Fundamental Ratings
GGXXF
GLBKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10023
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3539
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5031

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GGXXF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as GLBKF (21). This means that GGXXF’s stock grew similarly to GLBKF’s over the last 12 months.

GLBKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GGXXF (100). This means that GLBKF’s stock grew significantly faster than GGXXF’s over the last 12 months.

GLBKF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GGXXF (100). This means that GLBKF’s stock grew similarly to GGXXF’s over the last 12 months.

GGXXF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as GLBKF (39). This means that GGXXF’s stock grew similarly to GLBKF’s over the last 12 months.

GGXXF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLBKF (100). This means that GGXXF’s stock grew significantly faster than GLBKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGXXFGLBKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GGXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FBAK273.007.00
+2.63%
First National Bank Alaska
YGRAF0.730.01
+0.92%
Yangarra Resources Ltd.
WTKWY131.750.24
+0.18%
Wolters Kluwer N.V.
NPONF469.64N/A
N/A
NIPPON PROLOGIS REIT INC.
SNRG0.04-0.01
-19.26%
Susglobal Energy Corp.

GGXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGXXF and GLBKF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGXXF and GLBKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGXXF
1D Price
Change %
GGXXF100%
N/A
GLBKF - GGXXF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GFGSF - GGXXF
5%
Poorly correlated
+5.25%
GFKRF - GGXXF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GFIOF - GGXXF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBBFF - GGXXF
-6%
Poorly correlated
+9.97%
More

GLBKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLBKF has been loosely correlated with STBMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLBKF jumps, then STBMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLBKF
1D Price
Change %
GLBKF100%
N/A
STBMF - GLBKF
50%
Loosely correlated
+10.94%
RMLRF - GLBKF
23%
Poorly correlated
+7.98%
GNSMF - GLBKF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRBIF - GLBKF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGLDF - GLBKF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
More