GGZ | SAGP | GGZ / SAGP | |
Gain YTD | 17.218 | 13.672 | 126% |
Net Assets | 130M | 55M | 236% |
Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.65 | 254% |
Turnover | 8.00 | 68.00 | 12% |
Yield | 0.74 | 0.65 | 113% |
Fund Existence | 11 years | 4 years | - |
GGZ | SAGP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago73% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | 4 days ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 4 days ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% | 4 days ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago73% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago73% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago87% | 13 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago72% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago79% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GGZ and SONY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGZ and SONY's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAGP has been loosely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAGP jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAGP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SAGP | 100% | -1.17% | ||
BAM - SAGP | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.02% | ||
NVRI - SAGP | 55% Loosely correlated | -5.81% | ||
PLTR - SAGP | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.58% | ||
NGVT - SAGP | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.33% | ||
SN - SAGP | 51% Loosely correlated | -3.26% | ||
More |