Ad is loading...
GGZPX vs RWEBX
GGZPX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GGZPX vs RWEBX
Goldman Sachs Enh Cor EqFund-ShareclassP
Price$19.17
Change-$1.17 (-5.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets379.69M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$55.79
Change-$3.44 (-5.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets180.69B
GGZPX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGZPX vs. RWEBX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGZPX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 181B vs. GGZPX (380M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GGZPX: RWEBX (0.83) vs GGZPX (0.61). GGZPX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GGZPX (7 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than GGZPX (0.88). GGZPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RWEBX (31.00). GGZPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: GGZPX (0) vs RWEBX (250). GGZPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.69 vs. RWEBX (1.38). GGZPX return over 5 years is better than : 109.43 vs. RWEBX (75.23).
| GGZPX | RWEBX | GGZPX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.06 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.06 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.332 | 0.766 | -565% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 380M | 181B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.83 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.69 | 1.38 | 412% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.81 | 6.61 | 360% |
| Returns for 5 years | 109.43 | 75.23 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 55.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...