Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGZPX vs RWEBX
GGZPX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GGZPX vs RWEBX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity P
Price$23.50
Change+$0.13 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets456.11M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$64.02
Change+$0.25 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets200.69B
GGZPX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGZPX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGZPX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 201B vs. GGZPX (456M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GGZPX: RWEBX (0.80) vs GGZPX (0.55). GGZPX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GGZPX (7 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than GGZPX (0.88). GGZPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). GGZPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: GGZPX (0) vs RWEBX (250). GGZPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.95 vs. RWEBX (3.88). GGZPX return over 5 years is better than : 74.11 vs. RWEBX (47.99).
| GGZPX | RWEBX | GGZPX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.06 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.06 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.377 | 5.106 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 456M | 201B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.80 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.95 | 3.88 | 231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.49 | 29.84 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.11 | 47.99 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement