Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGZPX vs RWMFX
GGZPX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GGZPX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity P
Price$22.60
Change+$0.22 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets436.19M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.97
Change+$0.35 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets194.6B
GGZPX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGZPX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGZPX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 195B vs. GGZPX (436M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GGZPX: RWMFX (1.47) vs GGZPX (0.58). GGZPX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GGZPX (7 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GGZPX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GGZPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RWMFX (31.00). GGZPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: GGZPX (0) vs RWMFX (250). GGZPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.83 vs. RWMFX (6.12). GGZPX return over 5 years is better than : 69.31 vs. RWMFX (49.94).
| GGZPX | RWMFX | GGZPX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.31 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.31 | 284% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.045 | 6.014 | -1% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 436M | 195B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.47 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.83 | 6.12 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.66 | 18.81 | 221% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.31 | 49.94 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement