Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGZPX vs RWMFX
GGZPX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GGZPX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity P
Price$23.50
Change+$0.13 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets456.11M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.45
Change+$0.25 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets200.69B
GGZPX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGZPX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGZPX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 201B vs. GGZPX (456M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GGZPX: RWMFX (1.48) vs GGZPX (0.55). GGZPX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GGZPX (7 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GGZPX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GGZPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). GGZPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: GGZPX (0) vs RWMFX (250). GGZPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.95 vs. RWMFX (4.71). GGZPX return over 5 years is better than : 74.11 vs. RWMFX (52.14).
| GGZPX | RWMFX | GGZPX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.31 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.31 | 284% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.377 | 5.559 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 456M | 201B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.48 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.95 | 4.71 | 190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.49 | 32.47 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.11 | 52.14 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers