Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGZPX vs RWMFX
GGZPX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GGZPX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity P
Price$23.01
Change+$0.17 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets443.78M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$63.18
Change+$0.56 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.28B
GGZPX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGZPX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGZPX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 196B vs. GGZPX (444M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GGZPX: RWMFX (1.47) vs GGZPX (0.58). GGZPX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GGZPX (7 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GGZPX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GGZPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RWMFX (31.00). GGZPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: GGZPX (0) vs RWMFX (250). GGZPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.91 vs. RWMFX (6.38). GGZPX return over 5 years is better than : 82.33 vs. RWMFX (58.47).
| GGZPX | RWMFX | GGZPX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.31 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.31 | 284% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.010 | 3.479 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 444M | 196B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.47 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.91 | 6.38 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.05 | 27.90 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.33 | 58.47 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement