Ad is loading...
GGZPX vs RWMFX
GGZPX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GGZPX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Enh Cor EqFund-ShareclassP
Price$21.42
Change+$0.16 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets398.03M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$61.87
Change+$0.27 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets186.89B
GGZPX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGZPX vs. RWMFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGZPX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 187B vs. GGZPX (398M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GGZPX: RWMFX (1.53) vs GGZPX (0.61). GGZPX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GGZPX (7 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GGZPX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GGZPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RWMFX (31.00). GGZPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: GGZPX (0) vs RWMFX (250). GGZPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.11 vs. RWMFX (2.22). GGZPX return over 5 years is better than : 107.87 vs. RWMFX (79.80).
| GGZPX | RWMFX | GGZPX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.31 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.31 | 284% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.047 | 0.955 | -528% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 398M | 187B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 1.53 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.11 | 2.22 | 230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.73 | 8.71 | 272% |
| Returns for 5 years | 107.87 | 79.80 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...