Ad is loading...
GGZPX vs RWMFX
GGZPX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GGZPX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity P
Price$21.37
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets426.01M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$61.62
Change-$0.17 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets186.07B
GGZPX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGZPX vs. RWMFX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGZPX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 186B vs. GGZPX (426M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GGZPX: RWMFX (1.54) vs GGZPX (0.61). GGZPX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GGZPX (7 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GGZPX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GGZPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RWMFX (31.00). GGZPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: GGZPX (0) vs RWMFX (250). GGZPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.86 vs. RWMFX (1.99). GGZPX return over 5 years is better than : 76.36 vs. RWMFX (55.37).
| GGZPX | RWMFX | GGZPX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.31 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.31 | 284% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.556 | 0.547 | -832% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 426M | 186B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 1.54 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.86 | 1.99 | 294% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.87 | 17.60 | 232% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.36 | 55.37 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 58.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...