Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGZPX vs RWMFX
GGZPX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GGZPX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity P
Price$24.71
Change-$0.04 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets463.75M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.94
Change-$0.11 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.44B
GGZPX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGZPX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGZPX is a Buy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. GGZPX (464M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GGZPX: RWMFX (1.43) vs GGZPX (0.53). GGZPX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GGZPX (7 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GGZPX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GGZPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). GGZPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: GGZPX (0) vs RWMFX (250). GGZPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.49 vs. RWMFX (6.98). GGZPX return over 5 years is better than : 76.08 vs. RWMFX (53.79).
| GGZPX | RWMFX | GGZPX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.31 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.31 | 284% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.540 | 9.637 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 464M | 207B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.43 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.49 | 6.98 | 207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.05 | 37.67 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.08 | 53.79 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 88.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement