It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLGCY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GHC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LGCY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
GHC (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а +4.18% price change this week, while LGCY (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was +3.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.55%.
GHC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
LGCY is expected to report earnings on Oct 13, 2025.
‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
GHC | LGCY | GHC / LGCY | |
Capitalization | 4.93B | 154M | 3,203% |
EBITDA | 1.36B | 10.4M | 13,115% |
Gain YTD | 30.535 | 49.399 | 62% |
P/E Ratio | 7.34 | 21.17 | 35% |
Revenue | 4.84B | 59M | 8,195% |
Total Cash | 1.07B | 17.3M | 6,208% |
Total Debt | 1.25B | 17.9M | 7,000% |
GHC | LGCY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 67 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 38 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 38 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GHC's Valuation (39) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as LGCY (70) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew similarly to LGCY’s over the last 12 months.
GHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGCY (67) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGCY’s over the last 12 months.
LGCY's SMR Rating (38) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as GHC (51) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that LGCY’s stock grew similarly to GHC’s over the last 12 months.
LGCY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as GHC (41) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that LGCY’s stock grew similarly to GHC’s over the last 12 months.
LGCY's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GHC (98) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that LGCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GHC’s over the last 12 months.
GHC | LGCY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago71% | 4 days ago55% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago51% | 4 days ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago48% | 4 days ago71% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago58% | 4 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago56% | 4 days ago90% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago56% | 13 days ago89% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago44% | 6 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago43% | 4 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago54% | 4 days ago89% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
DBMYX | 31.87 | 0.53 | +1.69% |
BNY Mellon Sm/Md Cp Gr Y | |||
PXDIX | 10.21 | 0.04 | +0.39% |
Impax Global Sustainable Infras Instl | |||
RTDTX | 16.92 | -0.03 | -0.18% |
Russell Inv Multifactor US Equity M | |||
GQRPX | 18.64 | -0.06 | -0.32% |
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Inv | |||
RRGSX | 104.77 | -0.38 | -0.36% |
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock R |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GHC has been loosely correlated with MSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GHC jumps, then MSA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GHC | 100% | +0.29% | ||
MSA - GHC | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
CASS - GHC | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.90% | ||
AZZ - GHC | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
LOPE - GHC | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
ATGE - GHC | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGCY has been loosely correlated with TAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LGCY jumps, then TAL could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LGCY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LGCY | 100% | -0.56% | ||
TAL - LGCY | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
GOTU - LGCY | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.91% | ||
EDU - LGCY | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
YQ - LGCY | 11% Poorly correlated | -9.84% | ||
GHC - LGCY | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
More |