It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GHG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GHG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
GHG (@Cable/Satellite TV) experienced а -5.70% price change this week, while WH (@Cable/Satellite TV) price change was -3.41% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Cable/Satellite TV industry was -3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.88%.
WH is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.
Companies that operate paid and subscriber-based broadcast facilities for cable and home satellite systems. Comcast Corp, Charter Communications, Inc. and DISH Network Corporation are some of the biggest cable/satellite TV providers. Customers typically pay a regular monthly fee to cable TV operators for unlimited access to a certain package of channels. Since the rising popularity of online streaming services have increased instances of cord-cutting among consumers, several cable operators have also diversified into internet services to milk the burgeoning appetite for internet-based content.
| GHG | WH | GHG / WH | |
| Capitalization | 185M | 5.35B | 3% |
| EBITDA | 366M | 635M | 58% |
| Gain YTD | -26.649 | -28.798 | 93% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.88 | 16.51 | 42% |
| Revenue | 1.25B | 1.44B | 87% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 70M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 2.63B | - |
GHG | WH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 80 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GHG's Valuation (22) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as WH (31). This means that GHG’s stock grew similarly to WH’s over the last 12 months.
WH's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GHG (100). This means that WH’s stock grew somewhat faster than GHG’s over the last 12 months.
WH's SMR Rating (21) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as GHG (52). This means that WH’s stock grew similarly to GHG’s over the last 12 months.
GHG's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as WH (80). This means that GHG’s stock grew similarly to WH’s over the last 12 months.
GHG's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as WH (91). This means that GHG’s stock grew similarly to WH’s over the last 12 months.
| GHG | WH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 68% | 18 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 57% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GHG and HTHT have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GHG and HTHT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHG | 100% | -4.71% | ||
| HTHT - GHG | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.52% | ||
| ATAT - GHG | 14% Poorly correlated | -1.71% | ||
| ICHGF - GHG | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IHG - GHG | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
| MAR - GHG | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.46% | ||
More | ||||