GHG
Price
$1.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 9, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
114.01M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WH
Price
$80.52
Change
+$0.93 (+1.17%)
Updated
Jun 9, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.02B
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GHG vs WH

Header iconGHG vs WH Comparison
Open Charts GHG vs WHBanner chart's image
GHG vs WH Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GHG vs. WH commentary
Jun 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GHG is a Buy and WH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 10, 2026
Stock price -- (GHG: $1.13 vs. WH: $80.48)
Brand notoriety: GHG and WH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Cable/Satellite TV industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GHG: 11% vs. WH: 97%
Market capitalization -- GHG: $114.01M vs. WH: $6.02B
GHG [@Cable/Satellite TV] is valued at $114.01M. WH’s [@Cable/Satellite TV] market capitalization is $6.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry ranges from $103.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry is $23.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GHG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GHG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WH is a better buy in the long-term than GHG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GHG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GHG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WH is a better buy in the short-term than GHG.

Price Growth

GHG (@Cable/Satellite TV) experienced а -9.60% price change this week, while WH (@Cable/Satellite TV) price change was -1.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Cable/Satellite TV industry was -1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

WH is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Cable/Satellite TV (-1.53% weekly)

Companies that operate paid and subscriber-based broadcast facilities for cable and home satellite systems. Comcast Corp, Charter Communications, Inc. and DISH Network Corporation are some of the biggest cable/satellite TV providers. Customers typically pay a regular monthly fee to cable TV operators for unlimited access to a certain package of channels. Since the rising popularity of online streaming services have increased instances of cord-cutting among consumers, several cable operators have also diversified into internet services to milk the burgeoning appetite for internet-based content.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WH($6.03B) has a higher market cap than GHG($114M). WH has higher P/E ratio than GHG: WH (31.94) vs GHG (4.63). WH YTD gains are higher at: 7.094 vs. GHG (-33.136). WH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 475M vs. GHG (366M). WH has higher revenues than GHG: WH (1.44B) vs GHG (1.25B).
GHGWHGHG / WH
Capitalization114M6.03B2%
EBITDA366M475M77%
Gain YTD-33.1367.094-467%
P/E Ratio4.6331.9415%
Revenue1.25B1.44B87%
Total CashN/A79M-
Total DebtN/A2.65B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GHG vs WH: Fundamental Ratings
GHG
WH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8453
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10079
SMR RATING
1..100
10030
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9717
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a25

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GHG's Valuation (5) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WH (66). This means that GHG’s stock grew somewhat faster than WH’s over the last 12 months.

WH's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as GHG (100). This means that WH’s stock grew similarly to GHG’s over the last 12 months.

WH's SMR Rating (30) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for GHG (100). This means that WH’s stock grew significantly faster than GHG’s over the last 12 months.

WH's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as GHG (79). This means that WH’s stock grew similarly to GHG’s over the last 12 months.

WH's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for GHG (97). This means that WH’s stock grew significantly faster than GHG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GHGWH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GHG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UPW22.410.43
+1.94%
ProShares Ultra Utilities
RSBA20.830.08
+0.41%
Return Stacked Bonds & Mrg Arbtrg ETF
VXF234.170.68
+0.29%
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
EOI19.34-0.04
-0.21%
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund
SPE13.70-0.13
-0.94%
Special Opportunities Fund

WH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WH has been closely correlated with CHH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WH jumps, then CHH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WH
1D Price
Change %
WH100%
+1.12%
CHH - WH
68%
Closely correlated
+3.00%
HLT - WH
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
MAR - WH
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
H - WH
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
IHG - WH
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
More