Ad is loading...
GIBAX vs PDBAX
GIBAX vs PDBAX Comparison
Open Charts GIBAX vs PDBAX
Guggenheim Total Return Bond A
Price$23.59
Change+$0.12 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.15B
PGIM Total Return Bond A
Price$11.93
Change+$0.06 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.53B
GIBAX vs PDBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GIBAX vs. PDBAX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GIBAX is a Hold and PDBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBAX has more cash in the bank: 48.5B vs. GIBAX (27.1B). GIBAX (4.45) and PDBAX (4.38) have matching dividends . GIBAX was incepted earlier than PDBAX: GIBAX (13 years) vs PDBAX (30 years). GIBAX (0.88) is less costly to investors than PDBAX (0.77). PDBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. GIBAX (70.00). GIBAX initial investment is less costly to investors than PDBAX (3%) vs PDBAX (3%). PDBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GIBAX: PDBAX (1000) vs GIBAX (2500). GIBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.25 vs. PDBAX (6.48). PDBAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.41 vs. GIBAX (-0.60).
| GIBAX | PDBAX | GIBAX / PDBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.76 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.77 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.299 | 1.158 | 112% |
| Front Load | 4% | 3% | 123% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.1B | 48.5B | 56% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.45 | 4.38 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.25 | 6.48 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.52 | 3.93 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.60 | -0.41 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.77 | 12.67 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers