GIG vs GIGGU
To understand the difference between Gigcapital4 Inc (GIG) vs. Gigcapital4 Inc - Units (1 Ord Share & 1/3 War) (GIGGU) it is enough to know the definitions of Units
Units - The Units are a combination of securities. Generally, after 45-52 days after the Unit commenced public trading, it can be converted into securities that can be traded separately.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GIG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGIGGU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GIG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GIGGU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
GIG (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.30% price change this week, while GIGGU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.80%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (-0.19% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| GIG | GIGGU | GIG / GIGGU | |
| Capitalization | 50.8M | N/A | - |
| EBITDA | -9.23M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.500 | 0.012 | 4,200% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 336M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.65M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 125K | - |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
GIG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GIG has been loosely correlated with ATMV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GIG jumps, then ATMV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GIG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GIG | 100% | N/A | ||
| ATMV - GIG | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| CLRC - GIG | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GIGGU - GIG | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
| AACT - GIG | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| VOYA - GIG | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.20% | ||
More | ||||
GIGGU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GIGGU and NFTN have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GIGGU and NFTN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GIGGU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GIGGU | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| NFTN - GIGGU | 32% Poorly correlated | +8.76% | ||
| BYNO - GIGGU | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GIG - GIGGU | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AQU - GIGGU | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SBHGF - GIGGU | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.97% | ||
More | ||||