It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GIGGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNLIBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GIGGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NLIBF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
GIGGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +5.12% price change this week, while NLIBF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +55.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.60%.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
GIGGF | NLIBF | GIGGF / NLIBF | |
Capitalization | 16.6M | 39.1M | 42% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -41.670 | -49.603 | 84% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Cash | N/A | 3.88M | - |
Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
GIGGF | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GIGGF | NLIBF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago22% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago33% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago27% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago20% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago75% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago90% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago37% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
PFH | 18.53 | 0.21 | +1.15% |
Prudential Financial | |||
DFCA | 50.21 | -0.09 | -0.18% |
Dimensional California Municipal Bd ETF | |||
ESGG | 174.02 | -0.87 | -0.50% |
FlexShares STOXX Glbl ESG Select ETF | |||
WUGI | 78.34 | -0.42 | -0.53% |
AXS Esoterica NextG Economy ETF | |||
VFLO | 34.44 | -0.30 | -0.86% |
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GIGGF and ISENF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GIGGF and ISENF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GIGGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GIGGF | 100% | N/A | ||
ISENF - GIGGF | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.39% | ||
TLOFF - GIGGF | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.11% | ||
ATCUF - GIGGF | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.33% | ||
FLMCF - GIGGF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
NLIBF - GIGGF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NLIBF has been loosely correlated with SCCFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NLIBF jumps, then SCCFF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NLIBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NLIBF | 100% | N/A | ||
SCCFF - NLIBF | 45% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
DUVNF - NLIBF | 25% Poorly correlated | +31.19% | ||
SMMYY - NLIBF | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.57% | ||
ILKAF - NLIBF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SRCGF - NLIBF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |