GIGGF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
NLIBF
Price
$0.17
Change
+$0.06 (+54.55%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Ad is loading...

GIGGF vs NLIBF

Header iconGIGGF vs NLIBF Comparison
Open Charts GIGGF vs NLIBFBanner chart's image
Giga Metals
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$74.3K
CapitalizationN/A
NOA LITHIUM BRINES
Price$0.17
Change+$0.06 (+54.55%)
Volume$9.67K
CapitalizationN/A
GIGGF vs NLIBF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GIGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NLIBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GIGGF vs. NLIBF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GIGGF is a Hold and NLIBF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (GIGGF: $0.08 vs. NLIBF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: GIGGF and NLIBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GIGGF: 82% vs. NLIBF: 34%
Market capitalization -- GIGGF: $16.62M vs. NLIBF: $39.06M
GIGGF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $16.62M. NLIBF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $39.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GIGGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNLIBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GIGGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NLIBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NLIBF is a better buy in the long-term than GIGGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GIGGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NLIBF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GIGGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NLIBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NLIBF is a better buy in the short-term than GIGGF.

Price Growth

GIGGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +5.12% price change this week, while NLIBF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +55.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.60%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.58% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLIBF($39.1M) has a higher market cap than GIGGF($16.6M). GIGGF YTD gains are higher at: -41.670 vs. NLIBF (-49.603).
GIGGFNLIBFGIGGF / NLIBF
Capitalization16.6M39.1M42%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-41.670-49.60384%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A3.88M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GIGGF: Fundamental Ratings
GIGGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
88
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GIGGFNLIBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GIGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NLIBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PFH18.530.21
+1.15%
Prudential Financial
DFCA50.21-0.09
-0.18%
Dimensional California Municipal Bd ETF
ESGG174.02-0.87
-0.50%
FlexShares STOXX Glbl ESG Select ETF
WUGI78.34-0.42
-0.53%
AXS Esoterica NextG Economy ETF
VFLO34.44-0.30
-0.86%
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF

GIGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GIGGF and ISENF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GIGGF and ISENF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GIGGF
1D Price
Change %
GIGGF100%
N/A
ISENF - GIGGF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.39%
TLOFF - GIGGF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
ATCUF - GIGGF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
FLMCF - GIGGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NLIBF - GIGGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NLIBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NLIBF has been loosely correlated with SCCFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NLIBF jumps, then SCCFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NLIBF
1D Price
Change %
NLIBF100%
N/A
SCCFF - NLIBF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DUVNF - NLIBF
25%
Poorly correlated
+31.19%
SMMYY - NLIBF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
ILKAF - NLIBF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRCGF - NLIBF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More