GIGGU vs MLAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GIGGU is a Hold and MLAC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GIGGU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMLAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GIGGU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MLAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
GIGGU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.50% price change this week, while MLAC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.63%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+1.40% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| GIGGU | MLAC | GIGGU / MLAC | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 43.3M | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | -1.84M | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.706 | N/A | - |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 26.25 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 1.65M | 108K | 1,530% |
| Total Debt | 125K | 3.38M | 4% |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FDFAX | 90.47 | 1.39 | +1.56% |
| Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Port | |||
| LMRIX | 30.34 | -0.35 | -1.14% |
| 1919 Financial Services I | |||
| BGEWX | 9.31 | -0.15 | -1.59% |
| Baillie Gifford Emer Mkt Ex Chn Instl | |||
| SUWZX | 34.87 | -0.67 | -1.89% |
| DWS Core Equity R6 | |||
| GRHAX | 12.65 | -0.44 | -3.36% |
| Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Retail | |||
GIGGU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GIGGU and BYNO have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GIGGU and BYNO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GIGGU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GIGGU | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| BYNO - GIGGU | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GIG - GIGGU | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.10% | ||
| AQU - GIGGU | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SBHGF - GIGGU | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
| MLAC - GIGGU | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
MLAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLAC has been loosely correlated with BOWNU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLAC jumps, then BOWNU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLAC | 100% | N/A | ||
| BOWNU - MLAC | 55% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ATMV - MLAC | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CXAI - MLAC | 27% Poorly correlated | -4.46% | ||
| PWUP - MLAC | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BOWN - MLAC | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.95% | ||
More | ||||