Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
GILAX vs RMEBX
GILAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GILAX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity C
Price$13.97
Change-$0.06 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$58.52
Change-$0.52 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GILAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILAX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 104B vs. GILAX (2B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GILAX: RMEBX (1.54) vs GILAX (0.13). GILAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GILAX (31 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). GILAX (26.00) and RMEBX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILAX: RMEBX (250) vs GILAX (1500). GILAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.76 vs. RMEBX (21.12). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.89 vs. GILAX (23.91).
| GILAX | RMEBX | GILAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.544 | 16.258 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2B | 104B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 1.54 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.76 | 21.12 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.07 | 14.92 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.91 | 43.89 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.18 | 63.64 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...