Ad is loading...
GILAX vs RMEBX
GILAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GILAX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity C
Price$13.29
Change+$0.07 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.08
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
GILAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. GILAX (1.99B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GILAX: RMEBX (1.54) vs GILAX (0.13). GILAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GILAX (31 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). GILAX (26.00) and RMEBX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILAX: RMEBX (250) vs GILAX (1500). GILAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.52 vs. RMEBX (12.29). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.84 vs. GILAX (26.12).
| GILAX | RMEBX | GILAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.399 | 2.149 | 205% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 103B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 1.54 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.52 | 12.29 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.10 | 12.11 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.12 | 36.84 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.97 | 63.72 | 20% |