Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GILAX vs RMEBX
GILAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GILAX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity C
Price$13.94
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.89
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
GILAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GILAX (2.05B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GILAX: RMEBX (1.11) vs GILAX (0.18). GILAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GILAX (32 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GILAX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GILAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILAX: RMEBX (250) vs GILAX (1500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.81 vs. GILAX (4.70). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.09 vs. GILAX (44.06).
| GILAX | RMEBX | GILAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.07 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.07 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.348 | 11.509 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 1.11 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.70 | 6.81 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.02 | 28.69 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.06 | 53.09 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.33 | 89.52 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement