Ad is loading...
GILAX vs RMEBX
GILAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GILAX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity C
Price$12.57
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.87B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.29
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.86B
GILAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILAX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. GILAX (1.87B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GILAX: RMEBX (1.21) vs GILAX (0.20). GILAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GILAX (31 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GILAX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GILAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILAX: RMEBX (250) vs GILAX (1500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.24 vs. GILAX (-0.29). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 54.68 vs. GILAX (48.76).
| GILAX | RMEBX | GILAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.07 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.07 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.257 | 0.984 | -128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 101B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 1.21 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.29 | 4.24 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.21 | 16.76 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.76 | 54.68 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.76 | 59.09 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...