Ad is loading...
GILAX vs RMEBX
GILAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GILAX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity C
Price$12.14
Change+$0.81 (+7.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.67B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.86
Change+$3.35 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.19B
GILAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 92.2B vs. GILAX (1.67B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GILAX: RMEBX (1.18) vs GILAX (0.19). GILAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GILAX (31 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GILAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GILAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILAX: RMEBX (250) vs GILAX (1500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.56 vs. GILAX (-10.41). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.36 vs. GILAX (36.01).
| GILAX | RMEBX | GILAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.07 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.07 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.998 | -7.747 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.67B | 92.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 1.18 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.41 | -4.56 | 228% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.08 | -1.07 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.01 | 44.36 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.55 | 44.99 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...