Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GILAX vs RMEBX
GILAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GILAX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity C
Price$13.02
Change+$0.13 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.95
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
GILAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. GILAX (1.92B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GILAX: RMEBX (1.16) vs GILAX (0.19). GILAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GILAX (31 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GILAX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GILAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILAX: RMEBX (250) vs GILAX (1500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. GILAX (3.23). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.55 vs. GILAX (35.63).
| GILAX | RMEBX | GILAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.07 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.07 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.257 | 5.842 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 105B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 1.16 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.23 | 8.87 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.89 | 17.32 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.63 | 50.55 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.15 | 68.95 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement