Ad is loading...
GILAX vs RMEBX
GILAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GILAX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity C
Price$12.59
Change-$0.35 (-2.70%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$54.53
Change-$1.42 (-2.54%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GILAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 98.7B vs. GILAX (1.94B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GILAX: RMEBX (1.54) vs GILAX (0.13). GILAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GILAX (31 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). GILAX (26.00) and RMEBX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILAX: RMEBX (250) vs GILAX (1500). GILAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.83 vs. RMEBX (12.51). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.44 vs. GILAX (25.16).
| GILAX | RMEBX | GILAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.719 | 11.313 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 98.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 1.54 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.83 | 12.51 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.29 | 13.70 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.16 | 39.44 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.33 | 60.50 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers