Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GILAX vs RMEBX
GILAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GILAX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity C
Price$14.35
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.1B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.57
Change+$0.12 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
GILAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. GILAX (2.1B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GILAX: RMEBX (1.05) vs GILAX (0.17). GILAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GILAX (32 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GILAX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GILAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILAX: RMEBX (250) vs GILAX (1500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.71 vs. GILAX (6.26). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 57.72 vs. GILAX (48.71).
| GILAX | RMEBX | GILAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.07 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.07 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.647 | 14.848 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.1B | 113B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 1.05 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.26 | 7.71 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.34 | 43.29 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.71 | 57.72 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.68 | 92.43 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement