Ad is loading...
GILAX vs RMFCX
GILAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GILAX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity C
Price$13.29
Change+$0.07 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.77
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
GILAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. GILAX (1.99B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GILAX: RMFCX (1.69) vs GILAX (0.13). GILAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GILAX (31 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GILAX (26.00) and RMFCX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILAX: RMFCX (250) vs GILAX (1500). GILAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.52 vs. RMFCX (12.43). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.82 vs. GILAX (26.12).
| GILAX | RMFCX | GILAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.399 | 2.162 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 103B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 1.69 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.52 | 12.43 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.10 | 12.60 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.12 | 37.82 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.97 | 65.18 | 20% |