Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
GILAX vs RMFCX
GILAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GILAX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity C
Price$13.97
Change-$0.06 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$58.23
Change-$0.50 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GILAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILAX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 104B vs. GILAX (2B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GILAX: RMFCX (1.69) vs GILAX (0.13). GILAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GILAX (31 years) vs RMFCX (22 years). GILAX (26.00) and RMFCX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILAX: RMFCX (250) vs GILAX (1500). GILAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.76 vs. RMFCX (21.31). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.92 vs. GILAX (23.91).
| GILAX | RMFCX | GILAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.544 | 16.440 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2B | 104B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 1.69 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.76 | 21.31 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.07 | 15.46 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.91 | 44.92 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.18 | 65.01 | -6% |