Ad is loading...
GILAX vs RMFEX
GILAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GILAX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity C
Price$12.57
Change-$0.24 (-1.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$56.14
Change-$0.84 (-1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.15B
GILAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILAX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 104B vs. GILAX (1.91B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GILAX: RMFEX (1.56) vs GILAX (0.19). GILAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GILAX (31 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). GILAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). GILAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILAX: RMFEX (250) vs GILAX (1500). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.73 vs. GILAX (3.75). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.88 vs. GILAX (40.68).
| GILAX | RMFEX | GILAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.62 | 273% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.62 | 273% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.628 | 3.751 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 104B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 1.56 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.75 | 8.73 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.13 | 20.22 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.68 | 55.88 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.80 | 75.54 | 12% |