Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GILAX vs RMFEX
GILAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GILAX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity C
Price$14.23
Change-$0.03 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.42
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
GILAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILAX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. GILAX (2.07B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GILAX: RMFEX (1.46) vs GILAX (0.17). GILAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GILAX (32 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). GILAX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). GILAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILAX: RMFEX (250) vs GILAX (1500). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.34 vs. GILAX (2.12). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.02 vs. GILAX (40.77).
| GILAX | RMFEX | GILAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.62 | 274% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.62 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.019 | 13.076 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 110B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 1.46 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.12 | 6.34 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.31 | 29.13 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.77 | 55.02 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.72 | 92.11 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement