Ad is loading...
GILAX vs RMFEX
GILAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GILAX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity C
Price$12.59
Change-$0.35 (-2.70%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$54.54
Change-$1.43 (-2.55%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GILAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILAX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 98.7B vs. GILAX (1.94B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GILAX: RMFEX (1.95) vs GILAX (0.13). GILAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GILAX (31 years) vs RMFEX (22 years). GILAX (26.00) and RMFEX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILAX: RMFEX (250) vs GILAX (1500). GILAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.83 vs. RMFEX (12.89). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 42.46 vs. GILAX (25.16).
| GILAX | RMFEX | GILAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.719 | 11.693 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 98.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 1.95 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.83 | 12.89 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.29 | 15.13 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.16 | 42.46 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.33 | 67.84 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...