Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GILAX vs RMFEX
GILAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GILAX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity C
Price$13.50
Change+$0.09 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$59.82
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
GILAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILAX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GILAX (2B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GILAX: RMFEX (1.53) vs GILAX (0.19). GILAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GILAX (32 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). GILAX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). GILAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILAX: RMFEX (250) vs GILAX (1500). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.81 vs. GILAX (7.34). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 64.33 vs. GILAX (51.90).
| GILAX | RMFEX | GILAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.62 | 274% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.62 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.049 | 9.748 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 1.53 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.34 | 11.81 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.11 | 30.45 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.90 | 64.33 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.34 | 86.20 | 14% |