Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GILAX vs RMFEX
GILAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GILAX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity C
Price$14.35
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.1B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.60
Change+$0.12 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
GILAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILAX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. GILAX (2.1B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GILAX: RMFEX (1.46) vs GILAX (0.17). GILAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GILAX (32 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). GILAX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). GILAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILAX: RMFEX (250) vs GILAX (1500). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.19 vs. GILAX (6.26). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 61.35 vs. GILAX (48.71).
| GILAX | RMFEX | GILAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.62 | 274% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.62 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.647 | 15.248 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.1B | 113B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 1.46 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.26 | 8.19 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.34 | 45.24 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.71 | 61.35 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.68 | 102.04 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement