Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GILAX vs RMFEX
GILAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GILAX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity C
Price$13.02
Change+$0.13 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$58.02
Change+$0.32 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
GILAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILAX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. GILAX (1.92B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GILAX: RMFEX (1.58) vs GILAX (0.19). GILAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GILAX (31 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). GILAX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). GILAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILAX: RMFEX (250) vs GILAX (1500). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.37 vs. GILAX (3.23). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 54.01 vs. GILAX (35.63).
| GILAX | RMFEX | GILAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.62 | 274% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.62 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.257 | 6.053 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 105B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 1.58 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.23 | 9.37 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.89 | 18.90 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.63 | 54.01 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.15 | 77.06 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement