Ad is loading...
GILAX vs RMFEX
GILAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GILAX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity C
Price$13.29
Change+$0.07 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$56.11
Change+$0.29 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
GILAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILAX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. GILAX (1.99B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GILAX: RMFEX (1.95) vs GILAX (0.13). GILAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GILAX (31 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). GILAX (26.00) and RMFEX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILAX: RMFEX (250) vs GILAX (1500). GILAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.52 vs. RMFEX (12.78). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.96 vs. GILAX (26.12).
| GILAX | RMFEX | GILAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.399 | 2.167 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 103B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 1.95 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.52 | 12.78 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.10 | 13.63 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.12 | 39.96 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.97 | 71.41 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...