Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GILCX vs RWEBX
GILCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GILCX vs RWEBX
NAA Large Cap Value Institutional
Price$48.13
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.9M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$67.04
Change+$0.13 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.74B
GILCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILCX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. GILCX (71.9M). GILCX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: GILCX (1.49) vs RWEBX (0.76). GILCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GILCX (12 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). GILCX (1.06) and RWEBX (1.06) have similar cost to investors . RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. GILCX (13.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILCX: RWEBX (250) vs GILCX (2000000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.78 vs. GILCX (-0.34). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.84 vs. GILCX (32.98).
| GILCX | RWEBX | GILCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.06 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.06 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.640 | 10.264 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.9M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 0.76 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.34 | 5.78 | -6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.47 | 43.12 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.98 | 47.84 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.82 | 76.62 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement