Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GILCX vs RWEBX
GILCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GILCX vs RWEBX
NAA Large Cap Value Institutional
Price$48.84
Change+$0.33 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.7M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$67.88
Change+$0.53 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets210.62B
GILCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Nov 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILCX is a Buy and RWEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 211B vs. GILCX (73.7M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GILCX: RWEBX (0.76) vs GILCX (0.08). GILCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GILCX (12 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). GILCX (1.06) and RWEBX (1.06) have similar cost to investors . RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. GILCX (13.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILCX: RWEBX (250) vs GILCX (2000000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.54 vs. GILCX (-2.59). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 42.06 vs. GILCX (22.38).
| GILCX | RWEBX | GILCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.06 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.06 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.476 | 11.645 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.7M | 211B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 0.76 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.59 | 4.54 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.39 | 28.76 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.38 | 42.06 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.30 | 72.25 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement