Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GILDX vs LALDX
GILDX vs LALDX Comparison
Open Charts GILDX vs LALDX
Guggenheim Limited Duration A
Price$24.56
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.06B
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income A
Price$3.88
Change+$0.01 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.33B
GILDX vs LALDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILDX vs. LALDX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILDX is a Buy and LALDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LALDX has more cash in the bank: 42.3B vs. GILDX (5.06B). LALDX pays higher dividends than GILDX: LALDX (5.01) vs GILDX (4.08). GILDX was incepted earlier than LALDX: GILDX (12 years) vs LALDX (32 years). GILDX (0.79) is less costly to investors than LALDX (0.58). LALDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. GILDX (42.00). GILDX (2%) and LALDX (2%) have equivalent initial investment costs. LALDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILDX: LALDX (1500) vs GILDX (2500). GILDX (5.83) and LALDX (5.69) have marching annual gain over last year. GILDX (13.15) and LALDX (12.94) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GILDX | LALDX | GILDX / LALDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.58 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.58 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.242 | 2.124 | 106% |
| Front Load | 2% | 2% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1500 | 167% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.06B | 42.3B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.08 | 5.01 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.83 | 5.69 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.97 | 13.79 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.15 | 12.94 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.06 | 26.64 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement