Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GILDX vs LALDX
GILDX vs LALDX Comparison
Open Charts GILDX vs LALDX
Guggenheim Limited Duration A
Price$24.68
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.6B
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income A
Price$3.89
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.83B
GILDX vs LALDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILDX vs. LALDX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILDX is a Hold and LALDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LALDX has more cash in the bank: 42.8B vs. GILDX (5.6B). LALDX pays higher dividends than GILDX: LALDX (5.04) vs GILDX (4.16). GILDX was incepted earlier than LALDX: GILDX (12 years) vs LALDX (32 years). GILDX (0.79) is less costly to investors than LALDX (0.58). LALDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. GILDX (42.00). GILDX (2%) and LALDX (2%) have equivalent initial investment costs. LALDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILDX: LALDX (1500) vs GILDX (2500). LALDX (5.74) and GILDX (5.56) have marching annual gain over last year. LALDX (13.00) and GILDX (12.93) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GILDX | LALDX | GILDX / LALDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.58 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.58 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.750 | 4.859 | 98% |
| Front Load | 2% | 2% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1500 | 167% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.6B | 42.8B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.16 | 5.04 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.56 | 5.74 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.89 | 17.61 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.93 | 13.00 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.23 | 30.61 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement