Ad is loading...
GINNX vs NPFFX
GINNX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts GINNX vs NPFFX
Guinness Atkinson™ Global Inntrs Instl
Price$55.43
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets187.59M
American Funds New Perspective F1
Price$61.10
Change+$0.36 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.47B
GINNX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GINNX vs. NPFFX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GINNX is a Buy and NPFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. GINNX (188M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than GINNX: NPFFX (0.53) vs GINNX (0.00). GINNX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: GINNX (9 years) vs NPFFX (24 years). GINNX (1.13) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.78). NPFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. GINNX (8.77). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GINNX: NPFFX (250) vs GINNX (100000). NPFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.80 vs. GINNX (-7.06). NPFFX return over 5 years is better than : 68.70 vs. GINNX (49.49).
| GINNX | NPFFX | GINNX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.78 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.78 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.230 | -0.812 | 398% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 188M | 137B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.06 | 2.80 | -252% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.40 | 3.77 | -11% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.49 | 68.70 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...