Ad is loading...
GINNX vs NPFFX
GINNX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts GINNX vs NPFFX
Guinness Atkinson™ Global Inntrs Instl
Price$54.78
Change+$1.48 (+2.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets178.92M
American Funds New Perspective F1
Price$60.60
Change+$1.16 (+1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.95B
GINNX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GINNX vs. NPFFX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GINNX is a Buy and NPFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. GINNX (179M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than GINNX: NPFFX (0.53) vs GINNX (0.00). GINNX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: GINNX (9 years) vs NPFFX (24 years). GINNX (1.13) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.78). NPFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. GINNX (8.77). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GINNX: NPFFX (250) vs GINNX (100000). NPFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.21 vs. GINNX (-8.23). NPFFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.45 vs. GINNX (26.40).
| GINNX | NPFFX | GINNX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.78 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.78 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.442 | -1.623 | 397% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 179M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.23 | 4.21 | -195% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.27 | 11.45 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.40 | 47.45 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 56.72 | - |