Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GIRPX vs RNWBX
GIRPX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GIRPX vs RNWBX
Goldman Sachs Em Mkts Eq Insghts I
Price$11.00
Change-$0.13 (-1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.65B
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.50
Change-$0.93 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.89B
GIRPX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GIRPX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GIRPX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. GIRPX (2.65B). GIRPX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GIRPX (1.01) vs RNWBX (0.12). GIRPX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GIRPX (15 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than GIRPX (1.26). GIRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 168.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). GIRPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: GIRPX (0) vs RNWBX (250). GIRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.45 vs. RNWBX (18.50). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 16.42 vs. GIRPX (13.01).
| GIRPX | RNWBX | GIRPX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.67 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.67 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.268 | 23.046 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 74.9B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 0.12 | 859% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.45 | 18.50 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.60 | 43.20 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.01 | 16.42 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.81 | 82.43 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement