Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GIRPX vs RNWBX
GIRPX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GIRPX vs RNWBX
Goldman Sachs Em Mkts Eq Insghts I
Price$11.25
Change+$0.05 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.66B
American Funds New World R2
Price$91.25
Change-$0.05 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.33B
GIRPX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GIRPX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GIRPX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. GIRPX (2.66B). GIRPX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GIRPX (1.04) vs RNWBX (0.12). GIRPX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GIRPX (15 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than GIRPX (1.26). GIRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 168.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). GIRPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: GIRPX (0) vs RNWBX (250). GIRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.09 vs. RNWBX (11.81). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 26.47 vs. GIRPX (21.45).
| GIRPX | RNWBX | GIRPX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.67 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.67 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.081 | 24.065 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.66B | 75.3B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.12 | 864% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.09 | 11.81 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.96 | 54.92 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.45 | 26.47 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.05 | 86.78 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement