GL
Price
$121.70
Change
+$1.93 (+1.61%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
10.73B
46 days until earnings call
MET
Price
$79.93
Change
+$1.37 (+1.74%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
53.28B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GL vs MET

Header iconGL vs MET Comparison
Open Charts GL vs METBanner chart's image
Globe Life
Price$121.70
Change+$1.93 (+1.61%)
Volume$336.23K
Capitalization10.73B
MetLife
Price$79.93
Change+$1.37 (+1.74%)
Volume$1.94M
Capitalization53.28B
GL vs MET Comparison Chart
Loading...
GL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GL vs. MET commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GL is a Hold and MET is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (GL: $121.70 vs. MET: $79.93)
Brand notoriety: GL: Not notable vs. MET: Notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GL: 51% vs. MET: 54%
Market capitalization -- GL: $10.73B vs. MET: $53.28B
GL [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $10.73B. MET’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $53.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMET’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MET’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GL and MET are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MET’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MET’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GL is a better buy in the short-term than MET.

Price Growth

GL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -0.14% price change this week, while MET (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +1.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

GL is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

MET is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+0.04% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MET($53.3B) has a higher market cap than GL($10.7B). MET has higher P/E ratio than GL: MET (40.71) vs GL (11.33). GL YTD gains are higher at: 9.586 vs. MET (-1.030). MET has more cash in the bank: 308B vs. GL (18.1B). GL has less debt than MET: GL (2.12B) vs MET (18.8B). MET has higher revenues than GL: MET (66.4B) vs GL (5.45B).
GLMETGL / MET
Capitalization10.7B53.3B20%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.586-1.030-931%
P/E Ratio11.3340.7128%
Revenue5.45B66.4B8%
Total Cash18.1B308B6%
Total Debt2.12B18.8B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GL vs MET: Fundamental Ratings
GL
MET
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
577
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5317
SMR RATING
1..100
96100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4754
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2293
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MET's Valuation (43) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GL (80) in the null industry. This means that MET’s stock grew somewhat faster than GL’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GL (53) in the null industry. This means that MET’s stock grew somewhat faster than GL’s over the last 12 months.

GL's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as MET (100) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that GL’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

GL's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as MET (54) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that GL’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

GL's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MET (93) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that GL’s stock grew significantly faster than MET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLMET
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPUC42.630.78
+1.85%
Simplify US Equity PLUS Upsd Cnvxty ETF
IUSG144.471.43
+1.00%
iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF
ATFV27.960.12
+0.42%
Alger 35 ETF
ICOW33.440.06
+0.18%
Pacer Dev Mkts Intl Csh Cows 100 ETF
NAN11.310.01
+0.09%
Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund