GL
Price
$141.18
Change
+$1.67 (+1.20%)
Updated
Aug 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.73B
77 days until earnings call
MET
Price
$75.97
Change
+$1.08 (+1.44%)
Updated
Aug 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
53.28B
Earnings call today
Interact to see
Advertisement

GL vs MET

Header iconGL vs MET Comparison
Open Charts GL vs METBanner chart's image
Globe Life
Price$141.18
Change+$1.67 (+1.20%)
Volume$5.49K
Capitalization10.73B
MetLife
Price$75.97
Change+$1.08 (+1.44%)
Volume$22.64K
Capitalization53.28B
GL vs MET Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GL vs. MET commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GL is a StrongBuy and MET is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GL: $139.51 vs. MET: $74.89)
Brand notoriety: GL: Not notable vs. MET: Notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GL: 140% vs. MET: 153%
Market capitalization -- GL: $10.73B vs. MET: $53.28B
GL [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $10.73B. MET’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $53.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMET’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MET’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GL is a better buy in the long-term than MET.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MET’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GL is a better buy in the short-term than MET.

Price Growth

GL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -2.62% price change this week, while MET (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -2.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +2.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

GL is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

MET is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+2.46% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MET($53.3B) has a higher market cap than GL($10.7B). MET has higher P/E ratio than GL: MET (40.71) vs GL (11.33). GL YTD gains are higher at: 25.906 vs. MET (-6.562). MET has more cash in the bank: 308B vs. GL (18.1B). GL has less debt than MET: GL (2.12B) vs MET (18.8B). MET has higher revenues than GL: MET (66.4B) vs GL (5.45B).
GLMETGL / MET
Capitalization10.7B53.3B20%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.906-6.562-395%
P/E Ratio11.3340.7128%
Revenue5.45B66.4B8%
Total Cash18.1B308B6%
Total Debt2.12B18.8B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GL vs MET: Fundamental Ratings
GL
MET
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9175
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4523
SMR RATING
1..100
8399
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1060
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2288
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a28

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MET's Valuation (41) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GL (83) in the null industry. This means that MET’s stock grew somewhat faster than GL’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as GL (45) in the null industry. This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to GL’s over the last 12 months.

GL's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as MET (99) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that GL’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

GL's Price Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MET (60) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that GL’s stock grew somewhat faster than MET’s over the last 12 months.

GL's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MET (88) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that GL’s stock grew significantly faster than MET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLMET
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JIVE70.640.20
+0.28%
JPMorgan International Value ETF
EDF5.10N/A
N/A
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund
XNOV35.86-0.04
-0.12%
FT Vest US Eq Enh & Mod Buf ETF-Nov
SPYI50.69-0.19
-0.37%
NEOS S&P 500(R) High Income ETF
EGGQ45.07-0.67
-1.47%
NestYield Visionary ETF

MET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MET has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MET jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MET
1D Price
Change %
MET100%
+0.84%
PRU - MET
91%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
AFL - MET
86%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
LNC - MET
81%
Closely correlated
+2.27%
PRI - MET
80%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
JXN - MET
76%
Closely correlated
+2.14%
More