GLABF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.09 (-28.13%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
25.73M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
QCLS
Price
$4.30
Change
+$0.11 (+2.63%)
Updated
Oct 27, 11:42 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.48M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLABF vs QCLS

Header iconGLABF vs QCLS Comparison
Open Charts GLABF vs QCLSBanner chart's image
GEMINA LABORATORIES
Price$0.23
Change-$0.09 (-28.13%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization25.73M
Q/C Technologies
Price$4.30
Change+$0.11 (+2.63%)
Volume$670
Capitalization12.48M
GLABF vs QCLS Comparison Chart in %
GLABF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QCLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLABF vs. QCLS commentary
Oct 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLABF is a Hold and QCLS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GLABF: $0.23 vs. QCLS: $4.19)
Brand notoriety: GLABF and QCLS are both not notable
GLABF represents the Biotechnology, while QCLS is part of the Computer Processing Hardware industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLABF: 84% vs. QCLS: 1%
Market capitalization -- GLABF: $25.73M vs. QCLS: $12.48M
GLABF [@Biotechnology] is valued at $25.73M. QCLS’s [@Computer Processing Hardware] market capitalization is $12.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $108.04B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry ranges from $193.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.04B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry is $13.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLABF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQCLS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLABF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QCLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QCLS is a better buy in the long-term than GLABF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLABF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QCLS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLABF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QCLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QCLS is a better buy in the short-term than GLABF.

Price Growth

GLABF (@Biotechnology) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QCLS (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was -4.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.90%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was -1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +86.91%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (-0.63% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

@Computer Processing Hardware (-1.92% weekly)

Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLABF($25.7M) has a higher market cap than QCLS($12.5M). GLABF YTD gains are higher at: -57.726 vs. QCLS (-96.357). GLABF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.24M vs. QCLS (-8.36M). QCLS has more cash in the bank: 208K vs. GLABF (-167). QCLS has less debt than GLABF: QCLS (0) vs GLABF (241K). GLABF has higher revenues than QCLS: GLABF (10.9K) vs QCLS (0).
GLABFQCLSGLABF / QCLS
Capitalization25.7M12.5M206%
EBITDA-3.24M-8.36M39%
Gain YTD-57.726-96.35760%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue10.9K0-
Total Cash-167208K-0%
Total Debt241K0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QCLS: Fundamental Ratings
QCLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
46
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
66
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLABFQCLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLABF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QCLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CCNE24.740.44
+1.81%
CNB Financial Corp
HTGC17.62-0.02
-0.11%
Hercules Capital
PHM120.53-0.33
-0.27%
Pultegroup
ACOG6.87-0.12
-1.72%
Alpha Cognition Inc
AREB2.20-1.57
-41.64%
American Rebel Holdings Inc.

GLABF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLABF has been loosely correlated with ELVAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLABF jumps, then ELVAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLABF
1D Price
Change %
GLABF100%
N/A
ELVAF - GLABF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
QCLS - GLABF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
IDRSF - GLABF
23%
Poorly correlated
-24.91%
VYGR - GLABF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
ENTO - GLABF
8%
Poorly correlated
-7.34%
More

QCLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCLS has been loosely correlated with ARTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QCLS jumps, then ARTV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QCLS
1D Price
Change %
QCLS100%
+2.20%
ARTV - QCLS
47%
Loosely correlated
+11.78%
COGT - QCLS
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.95%
PHAT - QCLS
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
TVGN - QCLS
36%
Loosely correlated
+4.76%
LRMR - QCLS
32%
Poorly correlated
+6.58%
More