GLAD
Price
$27.27
Change
-$0.32 (-1.16%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
466.85M
GSBD
Price
$11.04
Change
-$0.18 (-1.60%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
1.64B
5 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLAD vs GSBD

Header iconGLAD vs GSBD Comparison
Open Charts GLAD vs GSBDBanner chart's image
Gladstone Capital
Price$27.27
Change-$0.32 (-1.16%)
Volume$101.63K
Capitalization466.85M
Goldman Sachs BDC
Price$11.04
Change-$0.18 (-1.60%)
Volume$545.37K
Capitalization1.64B
GLAD vs GSBD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLAD vs. GSBD commentary
Aug 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLAD is a Hold and GSBD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 02, 2025
Stock price -- (GLAD: $27.27 vs. GSBD: $11.04)
Brand notoriety: GLAD and GSBD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLAD: 129% vs. GSBD: 82%
Market capitalization -- GLAD: $466.85M vs. GSBD: $1.64B
GLAD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $466.85M. GSBD’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLAD’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileGSBD’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GLAD’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • GSBD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLAD is a better buy in the long-term than GSBD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLAD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSBD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLAD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GSBD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLAD is a better buy in the short-term than GSBD.

Price Growth

GLAD (@Investment Managers) experienced а -4.92% price change this week, while GSBD (@Investment Managers) price change was -7.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLAD is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

GSBD is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.88% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSBD($1.64B) has a higher market cap than GLAD($467M). GSBD has higher P/E ratio than GLAD: GSBD (8.29) vs GLAD (7.34). GLAD YTD gains are higher at: -0.022 vs. GSBD (-0.467). GSBD has more cash in the bank: 76.6M vs. GLAD (9.33M). GLAD has less debt than GSBD: GLAD (338M) vs GSBD (1.83B). GSBD has higher revenues than GLAD: GSBD (208M) vs GLAD (74M).
GLADGSBDGLAD / GSBD
Capitalization467M1.64B28%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.022-0.4675%
P/E Ratio7.348.2989%
Revenue74M208M36%
Total Cash9.33M76.6M12%
Total Debt338M1.83B19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLAD vs GSBD: Fundamental Ratings
GLAD
GSBD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8081
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1154
SMR RATING
1..100
2918
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4957
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
243
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSBD's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAD (18). This means that GSBD’s stock grew similarly to GLAD’s over the last 12 months.

GLAD's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSBD (54). This means that GLAD’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

GSBD's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAD (29). This means that GSBD’s stock grew similarly to GLAD’s over the last 12 months.

GLAD's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as GSBD (57). This means that GLAD’s stock grew similarly to GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

GSBD's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAD (24). This means that GSBD’s stock grew similarly to GLAD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLADGSBD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIOFX30.08N/A
N/A
Marsico International Opportunities
HMDCX26.22N/A
N/A
Hartford MidCap C
GFCUX23.66N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity R6
BRXIX15.73N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Intl Eq I
NSFDX8.49N/A
N/A
Natixis Target Retirement 2020 N

GLAD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLAD has been closely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLAD jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLAD
1D Price
Change %
GLAD100%
-1.16%
MAIN - GLAD
81%
Closely correlated
-1.10%
FDUS - GLAD
80%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
FSK - GLAD
79%
Closely correlated
-1.96%
ARCC - GLAD
79%
Closely correlated
-1.06%
TSLX - GLAD
75%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
More

GSBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSBD has been closely correlated with FSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSBD jumps, then FSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSBD
1D Price
Change %
GSBD100%
-1.60%
FSK - GSBD
82%
Closely correlated
-1.96%
BCSF - GSBD
79%
Closely correlated
-1.87%
TSLX - GSBD
76%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
BXSL - GSBD
76%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
GLAD - GSBD
74%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
More