GLAE
Price
$31.00
Change
+$6.00 (+24.00%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
75 days until earnings call
GMHLF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.04 (-40.00%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
Ad is loading...

GLAE vs GMHLF

Header iconGLAE vs GMHLF Comparison
Open Charts GLAE vs GMHLFBanner chart's image
GlassBridge Enterprises
Price$31.00
Change+$6.00 (+24.00%)
Volume$5
CapitalizationN/A
Gam Holding AG
Price$0.06
Change-$0.04 (-40.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
GLAE vs GMHLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GLAE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLAE vs. GMHLF commentary
Dec 27, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLAE is a Buy and GMHLF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2024
Stock price -- (GLAE: $31.00 vs. GMHLF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: GLAE and GMHLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLAE: 95% vs. GMHLF: 7%
Market capitalization -- GLAE: $226.53K vs. GMHLF: $94.36M
GLAE [@Investment Managers] is valued at $226.53K. GMHLF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $94.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLAE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGMHLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLAE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GMHLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLAE is a better buy in the long-term than GMHLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLAE’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GMHLF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLAE’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • GMHLF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLAE is a better buy in the short-term than GMHLF.

Price Growth

GLAE (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GMHLF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLAE is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.00% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMHLF($94.4M) has a higher market cap than GLAE($227K). GLAE YTD gains are higher at: -61.250 vs. GMHLF (-87.179). GLAE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3M vs. GMHLF (-299.5M). GMHLF has more cash in the bank: 131M vs. GLAE (600K). GMHLF has higher revenues than GLAE: GMHLF (433M) vs GLAE (200K).
GLAEGMHLFGLAE / GMHLF
Capitalization227K94.4M0%
EBITDA-3M-299.5M1%
Gain YTD-61.250-87.17970%
P/E Ratio0.19N/A-
Revenue200K433M0%
Total Cash600K131M0%
Total Debt3.8MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLAE vs GMHLF: Fundamental Ratings
GLAE
GMHLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3799
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9798
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4098
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
396
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLAE's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as GMHLF (74). This means that GLAE’s stock grew similarly to GMHLF’s over the last 12 months.

GLAE's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GMHLF (100). This means that GLAE’s stock grew similarly to GMHLF’s over the last 12 months.

GLAE's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as GMHLF (98). This means that GLAE’s stock grew similarly to GMHLF’s over the last 12 months.

GLAE's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMHLF (98). This means that GLAE’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMHLF’s over the last 12 months.

GLAE's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GMHLF (96). This means that GLAE’s stock grew significantly faster than GMHLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLAEGMHLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GLAE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NCNA1.330.13
+10.37%
NuCana plc
PLPC129.731.57
+1.23%
Preformed Line Products Company
LFT2.74N/A
N/A
Lument Finance Trust
EMN91.51-0.06
-0.07%
Eastman Chemical Company
FLG9.01-0.12
-1.31%
Flagstar Financial Inc

GLAE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLAE and PX have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLAE and PX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLAE
1D Price
Change %
GLAE100%
N/A
PX - GLAE
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
TSLX - GLAE
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
GBLBF - GLAE
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNNCF - GLAE
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HALFF - GLAE
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GMHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMHLF and SVCTF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMHLF and SVCTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMHLF
1D Price
Change %
GMHLF100%
N/A
SVCTF - GMHLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBLBY - GMHLF
8%
Poorly correlated
-4.16%
FRRPF - GMHLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HALFF - GMHLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAE - GMHLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More