GLAPY
Price
$71.00
Change
+$18.60 (+35.50%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.15B
39 days until earnings call
GRBMF
Price
$2.72
Change
-$0.04 (-1.45%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
23.09B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLAPY vs GRBMF

Header iconGLAPY vs GRBMF Comparison
Open Charts GLAPY vs GRBMFBanner chart's image
Glanbia
Price$71.00
Change+$18.60 (+35.50%)
Volume$114
Capitalization4.15B
Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. de C.V
Price$2.72
Change-$0.04 (-1.45%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization23.09B
GLAPY vs GRBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLAPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLAPY vs. GRBMF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLAPY is a Hold and GRBMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GLAPY: $71.00 vs. GRBMF: $2.72)
Brand notoriety: GLAPY and GRBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLAPY: 30% vs. GRBMF: 204%
Market capitalization -- GLAPY: $4.15B vs. GRBMF: $23.09B
GLAPY [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $4.15B. GRBMF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $23.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLAPY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGRBMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLAPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GRBMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLAPY is a better buy in the long-term than GRBMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLAPY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRBMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLAPY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GRBMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GLAPY and GRBMF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GLAPY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GRBMF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -1.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLAPY is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

GRBMF is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.77% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRBMF($23.1B) has a higher market cap than GLAPY($4.15B). GLAPY has higher P/E ratio than GRBMF: GLAPY (19.61) vs GRBMF (12.17). GRBMF YTD gains are higher at: 4.959 vs. GLAPY (-2.951). GRBMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 71.7B vs. GLAPY (387M). GRBMF has more cash in the bank: 7.19B vs. GLAPY (439M). GLAPY has less debt than GRBMF: GLAPY (1.01B) vs GRBMF (120B). GRBMF has higher revenues than GLAPY: GRBMF (408B) vs GLAPY (5.64B).
GLAPYGRBMFGLAPY / GRBMF
Capitalization4.15B23.1B18%
EBITDA387M71.7B1%
Gain YTD-2.9514.959-60%
P/E Ratio19.6112.17161%
Revenue5.64B408B1%
Total Cash439M7.19B6%
Total Debt1.01B120B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLAPY vs GRBMF: Fundamental Ratings
GLAPY
GRBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6773
SMR RATING
1..100
8765
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5262
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1670
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLAPY's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as GRBMF (49). This means that GLAPY’s stock grew similarly to GRBMF’s over the last 12 months.

GLAPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as GRBMF (73). This means that GLAPY’s stock grew similarly to GRBMF’s over the last 12 months.

GRBMF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAPY (87). This means that GRBMF’s stock grew similarly to GLAPY’s over the last 12 months.

GLAPY's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as GRBMF (62). This means that GLAPY’s stock grew similarly to GRBMF’s over the last 12 months.

GLAPY's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRBMF (70). This means that GLAPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLAPYGRBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLAPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGNCN25.300.04
+0.16%
AGNC Investment Corp
NVEC76.500.11
+0.14%
NVE Corp
ICCC6.39N/A
+0.08%
ImmuCell Corp
ELAN14.64-0.08
-0.54%
Elanco Animal Health
VRTS199.10-1.61
-0.80%
Virtus Investment Partners

GLAPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLAPY and GLUC have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLAPY and GLUC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLAPY
1D Price
Change %
GLAPY100%
N/A
GLUC - GLAPY
6%
Poorly correlated
-17.84%
GPDNF - GLAPY
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
GRBMF - GLAPY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLNFF - GLAPY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFY - GLAPY
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
More

GRBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRBMF and BMBOY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRBMF and BMBOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRBMF
1D Price
Change %
GRBMF100%
N/A
BMBOY - GRBMF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
GLUC - GRBMF
4%
Poorly correlated
-17.84%
GCHOY - GRBMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPAGF - GRBMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAPF - GRBMF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More