GLASF
Price
$7.55
Change
+$0.29 (+3.99%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
583.26M
GRUSF
Price
$0.43
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
106.75M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLASF vs GRUSF

Header iconGLASF vs GRUSF Comparison
Open Charts GLASF vs GRUSFBanner chart's image
Glass House Brands
Price$7.55
Change+$0.29 (+3.99%)
Volume$119.09K
Capitalization583.26M
Grown Rogue International
Price$0.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$175.82K
Capitalization106.75M
GLASF vs GRUSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRUSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLASF vs. GRUSF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLASF is a Hold and GRUSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GLASF: $7.55 vs. GRUSF: $0.43)
Brand notoriety: GLASF and GRUSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLASF: 37% vs. GRUSF: 91%
Market capitalization -- GLASF: $583.26M vs. GRUSF: $106.75M
GLASF [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $583.26M. GRUSF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $106.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $67.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $3.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLASF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRUSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRUSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRUSF is a better buy in the long-term than GLASF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLASF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRUSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLASF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GRUSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLASF is a better buy in the short-term than GRUSF.

Price Growth

GLASF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а -8.48% price change this week, while GRUSF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was -4.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +87.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+0.10% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLASF($583M) has a higher market cap than GRUSF($107M). GLASF has higher P/E ratio than GRUSF: GLASF (513.07) vs GRUSF (21.28). GLASF YTD gains are higher at: 30.172 vs. GRUSF (-34.965). GLASF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 49M vs. GRUSF (10.2M). GLASF has more cash in the bank: 40.7M vs. GRUSF (9.25M). GRUSF has less debt than GLASF: GRUSF (13.2M) vs GLASF (72.8M). GLASF has higher revenues than GRUSF: GLASF (222M) vs GRUSF (23.8M).
GLASFGRUSFGLASF / GRUSF
Capitalization583M107M545%
EBITDA49M10.2M480%
Gain YTD30.172-34.965-86%
P/E Ratio513.0721.282,411%
Revenue222M23.8M933%
Total Cash40.7M9.25M440%
Total Debt72.8M13.2M552%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLASF vs GRUSF: Fundamental Ratings
GLASF
GRUSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2284
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10059
SMR RATING
1..100
9453
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4256
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10065
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRUSF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLASF (94). This means that GRUSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLASF’s over the last 12 months.

GRUSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLASF (100). This means that GRUSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLASF’s over the last 12 months.

GRUSF's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLASF (94). This means that GRUSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLASF’s over the last 12 months.

GLASF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as GRUSF (56). This means that GLASF’s stock grew similarly to GRUSF’s over the last 12 months.

GRUSF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLASF (100). This means that GRUSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLASF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLASFGRUSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRUSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CFJAX35.23N/A
N/A
Calvert US Large Cap Value Rspnb Idx A
PNRAX58.29N/A
N/A
Putnam Research A
RYDAX108.01N/A
N/A
Rydex Dow Jones Industrial Average® A
TRDIX8.47N/A
N/A
Transamerica Sustainable Equity Inc I2
LMGPX76.04N/A
N/A
ClearBridge International Growth IS

GLASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLASF has been loosely correlated with TSNDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLASF jumps, then TSNDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLASF
1D Price
Change %
GLASF100%
+3.99%
TSNDF - GLASF
63%
Loosely correlated
+13.08%
GTBIF - GLASF
62%
Loosely correlated
+4.55%
TCNNF - GLASF
60%
Loosely correlated
+4.55%
VRNOF - GLASF
58%
Loosely correlated
+5.51%
CURLF - GLASF
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
More

GRUSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRUSF has been loosely correlated with GLASF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRUSF jumps, then GLASF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRUSF
1D Price
Change %
GRUSF100%
-0.25%
GLASF - GRUSF
34%
Loosely correlated
+3.99%
TSNDF - GRUSF
33%
Poorly correlated
+13.08%
TCNNF - GRUSF
29%
Poorly correlated
+4.55%
VRNOF - GRUSF
29%
Poorly correlated
+5.51%
CURLF - GRUSF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
More