Advertisement
GLASF vs GTBIF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLASF is a Hold and GTBIF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GLASF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGTBIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GLASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GTBIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GLASF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTBIF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GLASF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- GTBIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
GLASF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +1.80% price change this week, while GTBIF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -0.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +13.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +77.82%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+13.75% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| GLASF | GTBIF | GLASF / GTBIF | |
| Capitalization | 204M | 1.68B | 12% |
| EBITDA | -24.02M | 253M | -9% |
| Gain YTD | 2.328 | -33.905 | -7% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 172.41 | - |
| Revenue | 106M | 1.02B | 10% |
| Total Cash | 13.4M | 185M | 7% |
| Total Debt | 73.6M | 541M | 14% |
GLASF | GTBIF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 91 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GTBIF's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as GLASF (96). This means that GTBIF’s stock grew similarly to GLASF’s over the last 12 months.
GTBIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GLASF (100). This means that GTBIF’s stock grew similarly to GLASF’s over the last 12 months.
GTBIF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GLASF (100). This means that GTBIF’s stock grew similarly to GLASF’s over the last 12 months.
GLASF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as GTBIF (91). This means that GLASF’s stock grew similarly to GTBIF’s over the last 12 months.
GLASF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GTBIF (100). This means that GLASF’s stock grew similarly to GTBIF’s over the last 12 months.
| GLASF | GTBIF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 78% | 20 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 84% |
Advertisement
GLASF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLASF has been loosely correlated with TSNDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLASF jumps, then TSNDF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLASF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLASF | 100% | +1.63% | ||
| TSNDF - GLASF | 63% Loosely correlated | -4.17% | ||
| GTBIF - GLASF | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.05% | ||
| TCNNF - GLASF | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.50% | ||
| VRNOF - GLASF | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| CURLF - GLASF | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
More | ||||
GTBIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTBIF has been closely correlated with TCNNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GTBIF jumps, then TCNNF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GTBIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTBIF | 100% | +3.05% | ||
| TCNNF - GTBIF | 83% Closely correlated | +2.50% | ||
| CURLF - GTBIF | 82% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| VRNOF - GTBIF | 80% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| TSNDF - GTBIF | 78% Closely correlated | -4.17% | ||
| CRLBF - GTBIF | 71% Closely correlated | -2.03% | ||
More | ||||