GLASF
Price
$7.05
Change
+$0.42 (+6.33%)
Updated
Apr 30 closing price
Capitalization
203.76M
HYPMY
Price
$3.71
Change
-$0.29 (-7.25%)
Updated
Apr 30 closing price
Capitalization
5.79B
Ad is loading...

GLASF vs HYPMY

Header iconGLASF vs HYPMY Comparison
Open Charts GLASF vs HYPMYBanner chart's image
Glass House Brands
Price$7.05
Change+$0.42 (+6.33%)
Volume$293.74K
Capitalization203.76M
Hypera SA
Price$3.71
Change-$0.29 (-7.25%)
Volume$11.12K
Capitalization5.79B
GLASF vs HYPMY Comparison Chart
Loading...
GLASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLASF vs. HYPMY commentary
May 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLASF is a Buy and HYPMY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 01, 2025
Stock price -- (GLASF: $7.05 vs. HYPMY: $3.71)
Brand notoriety: GLASF and HYPMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLASF: 192% vs. HYPMY: 148%
Market capitalization -- GLASF: $203.76M vs. HYPMY: $5.79B
GLASF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $203.76M. HYPMY’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $5.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLASF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHYPMY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GLASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HYPMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HYPMY is a better buy in the long-term than GLASF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLASF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GLASF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

GLASF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +40.61% price change this week, while HYPMY (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -0.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +5.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

HYPMY is expected to report earnings on Mar 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+5.06% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HYPMY($5.79B) has a higher market cap than GLASF($204M). HYPMY YTD gains are higher at: 24.909 vs. GLASF (21.552). HYPMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.86B vs. GLASF (-24.02M). HYPMY has higher revenues than GLASF: HYPMY (7.75B) vs GLASF (106M).
GLASFHYPMYGLASF / HYPMY
Capitalization204M5.79B4%
EBITDA-24.02M2.86B-1%
Gain YTD21.55224.90987%
P/E RatioN/A15.95-
Revenue106M7.75B1%
Total Cash13.4MN/A-
Total Debt73.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HYPMY: Fundamental Ratings
HYPMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
16
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
79
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLASF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GLASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMD97.351.29
+1.34%
Advanced Micro Devices
KUKE4.430.05
+1.14%
Kuke Music Holding Limited
CIEN67.16-0.20
-0.30%
Ciena Corp
IVT27.86-0.09
-0.32%
InvenTrust Properties Corp
MCB61.93-0.34
-0.55%
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp

GLASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLASF has been loosely correlated with TSNDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLASF jumps, then TSNDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLASF
1D Price
Change %
GLASF100%
+6.33%
TSNDF - GLASF
63%
Loosely correlated
+19.29%
GTBIF - GLASF
62%
Loosely correlated
+12.05%
TCNNF - GLASF
60%
Loosely correlated
+6.24%
VRNOF - GLASF
58%
Loosely correlated
+5.26%
CURLF - GLASF
57%
Loosely correlated
+19.72%
More

HYPMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HYPMY and AYRWF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HYPMY and AYRWF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYPMY
1D Price
Change %
HYPMY100%
-7.25%
AYRWF - HYPMY
23%
Poorly correlated
+32.65%
PLNH - HYPMY
21%
Poorly correlated
+13.72%
CPIX - HYPMY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
GLASF - HYPMY
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.33%
KMDA - HYPMY
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.97%
More