It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GLASF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLFCR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GLASF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LFCR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
GLASF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +4.07% price change this week, while LFCR (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +10.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.91%.
LFCR is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2025.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
GLASF | LFCR | GLASF / LFCR | |
Capitalization | 204M | 177M | 115% |
EBITDA | -24.02M | -22.64M | 106% |
Gain YTD | -25.000 | -21.669 | 115% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 106M | 188M | 56% |
Total Cash | 13.4M | 4.22M | 317% |
Total Debt | 73.6M | 157M | 47% |
LFCR | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GLASF | LFCR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago79% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago78% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | 1 day ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 4 days ago75% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago86% | 6 days ago77% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLASF has been loosely correlated with TSNDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLASF jumps, then TSNDF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLASF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GLASF | 100% | +0.55% | ||
TSNDF - GLASF | 63% Loosely correlated | -10.34% | ||
GTBIF - GLASF | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.41% | ||
TCNNF - GLASF | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.38% | ||
VRNOF - GLASF | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
CURLF - GLASF | 57% Loosely correlated | +5.26% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LFCR and SHPH have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LFCR and SHPH's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LFCR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LFCR | 100% | +1.84% | ||
SHPH - LFCR | 31% Poorly correlated | -11.81% | ||
CGC - LFCR | 28% Poorly correlated | +9.43% | ||
TLRY - LFCR | 27% Poorly correlated | -3.56% | ||
GLASF - LFCR | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
ACB - LFCR | 26% Poorly correlated | +4.14% | ||
More |