GLASF vs OPTHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLASF is a Hold and OPTHF is a Sell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GLASF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOPTHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GLASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- OPTHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GLASF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OPTHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GLASF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- OPTHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
GLASF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +0.25% price change this week, while OPTHF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -2.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -5.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.90%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-5.07% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| GLASF | OPTHF | GLASF / OPTHF | |
| Capitalization | 204M | 12.5M | 1,632% |
| EBITDA | -24.02M | -4.33M | 555% |
| Gain YTD | 68.288 | -24.906 | -274% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 106M | 190K | 55,789% |
| Total Cash | 13.4M | 1.83M | 733% |
| Total Debt | 73.6M | 86.5K | 85,087% |
| GLASF | OPTHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| FOREX / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JPYHKD | 0.05 | 0.00 | +2.28% |
| Japan Yen - Hong Kong Dollar | |||
| DPRSX | 12.29 | 0.02 | +0.16% |
| Delaware Global Listed Real Assets Inst | |||
| CHFAUD | 1.74 | -0.00 | -0.04% |
| Switzerland Franc - Australian Dollar | |||
| PCY | 20.35 | -0.06 | -0.29% |
| Invesco Emerging Markets Sov Debt ETF | |||
| EURCHF | 0.93 | -0.00 | -0.34% |
| Euro - Switzerland Franc | |||
GLASF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLASF has been loosely correlated with TSNDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLASF jumps, then TSNDF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLASF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLASF | 100% | -0.38% | ||
| TSNDF - GLASF | 63% Loosely correlated | +4.59% | ||
| GTBIF - GLASF | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.42% | ||
| TCNNF - GLASF | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.50% | ||
| VRNOF - GLASF | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.93% | ||
| CURLF - GLASF | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
More | ||||
OPTHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OPTHF and ESAIY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OPTHF and ESAIY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OPTHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPTHF | 100% | -19.72% | ||
| ESAIY - OPTHF | 20% Poorly correlated | -5.26% | ||
| SHIEF - OPTHF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GLASF - OPTHF | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
| BGPPF - OPTHF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IMCC - OPTHF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.71% | ||
More | ||||