GLASF
Price
$8.33
Change
+$0.09 (+1.09%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
651.32M
OPTHF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
14.67M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLASF vs OPTHF

Header iconGLASF vs OPTHF Comparison
Open Charts GLASF vs OPTHFBanner chart's image
Glass House Brands
Price$8.33
Change+$0.09 (+1.09%)
Volume$549.5K
Capitalization651.32M
OPTIMI HEALTH
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$48.97K
Capitalization14.67M
GLASF vs OPTHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OPTHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLASF vs. OPTHF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLASF is a Buy and OPTHF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GLASF: $8.33 vs. OPTHF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: GLASF and OPTHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLASF: 124% vs. OPTHF: 251%
Market capitalization -- GLASF: $651.32M vs. OPTHF: $14.67M
GLASF [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $651.32M. OPTHF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $14.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $68.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $3.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLASF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOPTHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OPTHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OPTHF is a better buy in the long-term than GLASF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLASF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OPTHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLASF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OPTHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLASF is a better buy in the short-term than OPTHF.

Price Growth

GLASF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а +4.11% price change this week, while OPTHF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was +28.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +68.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +81.63%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+1.25% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLASF($651M) has a higher market cap than OPTHF($14.7M). GLASF YTD gains are higher at: 43.603 vs. OPTHF (-3.603). GLASF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 49M vs. OPTHF (-3.42M). GLASF has more cash in the bank: 40.7M vs. OPTHF (55.7K). OPTHF has less debt than GLASF: OPTHF (2.83M) vs GLASF (72.8M). GLASF has higher revenues than OPTHF: GLASF (222M) vs OPTHF (496K).
GLASFOPTHFGLASF / OPTHF
Capitalization651M14.7M4,429%
EBITDA49M-3.42M-1,433%
Gain YTD43.603-3.603-1,210%
P/E Ratio513.07N/A-
Revenue222M496K44,758%
Total Cash40.7M55.7K73,070%
Total Debt72.8M2.83M2,573%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLASF: Fundamental Ratings
GLASF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
28
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLASFOPTHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OPTHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLUR5.170.37
+7.71%
Pluri
TX33.130.62
+1.91%
Ternium SA
TMO489.741.62
+0.33%
Thermo Fisher Scientific
SPIR9.11N/A
N/A
Spire Global
CLOV2.63-0.06
-2.23%
Clover Health Investments Corp

GLASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLASF has been loosely correlated with TSNDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLASF jumps, then TSNDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLASF
1D Price
Change %
GLASF100%
+1.08%
TSNDF - GLASF
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
GTBIF - GLASF
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
TCNNF - GLASF
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
VRNOF - GLASF
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.37%
CURLF - GLASF
57%
Loosely correlated
+5.20%
More

OPTHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OPTHF and ESAIY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OPTHF and ESAIY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OPTHF
1D Price
Change %
OPTHF100%
+5.11%
ESAIY - OPTHF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
SHIEF - OPTHF
6%
Poorly correlated
-5.21%
GLASF - OPTHF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
BGPPF - OPTHF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMCC - OPTHF
3%
Poorly correlated
+7.96%
More