Advertisement
GLASF vs SWGHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLASF is a Buy and SWGHF is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GLASF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- GLASF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
| GLASF | SWGHF | GLASF / SWGHF | |
| Capitalization | 469M | 1.55B | 30% |
| EBITDA | 46M | 36B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 4.310 | -14.030 | -31% |
| P/E Ratio | 513.07 | 15.64 | 3,281% |
| Revenue | 216M | 177B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 34.6M | 51.4B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 76.1M | 93.4B | 0% |
GLASF | SWGHF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 37 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 75 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SWGHF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLASF (95). This means that SWGHF’s stock grew significantly faster than GLASF’s over the last 12 months.
SWGHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GLASF (100). This means that SWGHF’s stock grew similarly to GLASF’s over the last 12 months.
GLASF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as SWGHF (97). This means that GLASF’s stock grew similarly to SWGHF’s over the last 12 months.
GLASF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as SWGHF (75). This means that GLASF’s stock grew similarly to SWGHF’s over the last 12 months.
SWGHF's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as GLASF (100). This means that SWGHF’s stock grew similarly to GLASF’s over the last 12 months.
| GLASF | SWGHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 7% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 8% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 87% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
GLASF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLASF has been loosely correlated with TSNDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLASF jumps, then TSNDF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLASF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLASF | 100% | +0.83% | ||
| TSNDF - GLASF | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.90% | ||
| GTBIF - GLASF | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.60% | ||
| TCNNF - GLASF | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| VRNOF - GLASF | 58% Loosely correlated | +10.79% | ||
| CURLF - GLASF | 57% Loosely correlated | +6.55% | ||
More | ||||
SWGHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SWGHF and GLASF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWGHF and GLASF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SWGHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWGHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| GLASF - SWGHF | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
| BFRI - SWGHF | 5% Poorly correlated | -6.86% | ||
| TKNO - SWGHF | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.11% | ||
| FLGC - SWGHF | 4% Poorly correlated | -9.22% | ||
| AAWH - SWGHF | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||