Advertisement
GLASF vs SWGHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLASF is a Hold and SWGHF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GLASF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSWGHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GLASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SWGHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GLASF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- GLASF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GLASF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -2.14% price change this week, while SWGHF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +78.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.92%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+78.59% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| GLASF | SWGHF | GLASF / SWGHF | |
| Capitalization | 204M | 1.1B | 19% |
| EBITDA | -24.02M | -28.13B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | -1.466 | -14.030 | 10% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 13.18 | - |
| Revenue | 106M | 196B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 13.4M | 29.1B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 73.6M | 74B | 0% |
GLASF | SWGHF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 77 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SWGHF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLASF (96). This means that SWGHF’s stock grew significantly faster than GLASF’s over the last 12 months.
SWGHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GLASF (100). This means that SWGHF’s stock grew similarly to GLASF’s over the last 12 months.
GLASF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as SWGHF (99). This means that GLASF’s stock grew similarly to SWGHF’s over the last 12 months.
GLASF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as SWGHF (77). This means that GLASF’s stock grew similarly to SWGHF’s over the last 12 months.
SWGHF's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as GLASF (100). This means that SWGHF’s stock grew similarly to GLASF’s over the last 12 months.
| GLASF | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% |
Advertisement
GLASF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLASF has been loosely correlated with TSNDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLASF jumps, then TSNDF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLASF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLASF | 100% | +0.97% | ||
| TSNDF - GLASF | 63% Loosely correlated | -6.13% | ||
| GTBIF - GLASF | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.86% | ||
| TCNNF - GLASF | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| VRNOF - GLASF | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| CURLF - GLASF | 57% Loosely correlated | +3.41% | ||
More | ||||
SWGHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SWGHF and GLASF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWGHF and GLASF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SWGHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWGHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| GLASF - SWGHF | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.97% | ||
| BFRI - SWGHF | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
| TKNO - SWGHF | 5% Poorly correlated | +2.77% | ||
| FLGC - SWGHF | 4% Poorly correlated | +2.56% | ||
| AAWH - SWGHF | 2% Poorly correlated | -8.46% | ||
More | ||||