GLBKF
Price
$0.25
Change
+$0.10 (+66.67%)
Updated
Jul 29 closing price
Capitalization
52.73M
GNSMF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
7.51M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLBKF vs GNSMF

Header iconGLBKF vs GNSMF Comparison
Open Charts GLBKF vs GNSMFBanner chart's image
Goldbank Mining
Price$0.25
Change+$0.10 (+66.67%)
Volume$100
Capitalization52.73M
MOROCCO STRATEGIC MINERALS
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization7.51M
GLBKF vs GNSMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GNSMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLBKF vs. GNSMF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLBKF is a Buy and GNSMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GLBKF: $0.25 vs. GNSMF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: GLBKF and GNSMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLBKF: 100% vs. GNSMF: 3%
Market capitalization -- GLBKF: $52.73M vs. GNSMF: $7.51M
GLBKF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $52.73M. GNSMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $7.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLBKF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGNSMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLBKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GNSMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLBKF is a better buy in the long-term than GNSMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GNSMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GNSMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

GLBKF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GNSMF (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3316.97%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.27% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLBKF($52.7M) has a higher market cap than GNSMF($7.51M). GLBKF YTD gains are higher at: 64.055 vs. GNSMF (12.621). GLBKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -258.21K vs. GNSMF (-1.62M). GNSMF has more cash in the bank: 1.06M vs. GLBKF (198K). GNSMF has less debt than GLBKF: GNSMF (79.2K) vs GLBKF (185K). GLBKF (0) and GNSMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GLBKFGNSMFGLBKF / GNSMF
Capitalization52.7M7.51M702%
EBITDA-258.21K-1.62M16%
Gain YTD64.05512.621508%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash198K1.06M19%
Total Debt185K79.2K234%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLBKF: Fundamental Ratings
GLBKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
27
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLBKFGNSMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
10%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GNSMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DMRC8.530.09
+1.07%
Digimarc Corp
ADMA17.380.13
+0.75%
ADMA Biologics
PEG82.59-0.25
-0.30%
Public Service Enterprise Group
AMSF45.94-0.42
-0.91%
AMERISAFE
SABS2.10-0.02
-0.94%
SAB Biotherapeutics

GLBKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLBKF has been loosely correlated with STBMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLBKF jumps, then STBMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLBKF
1D Price
Change %
GLBKF100%
N/A
STBMF - GLBKF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RMLRF - GLBKF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
GNSMF - GLBKF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRBIF - GLBKF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.61%
GGLDF - GLBKF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
More

GNSMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GNSMF and YGTFF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GNSMF and YGTFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GNSMF
1D Price
Change %
GNSMF100%
N/A
YGTFF - GNSMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
GLBKF - GNSMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRBIF - GNSMF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.61%
NIOVF - GNSMF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUST - GNSMF
5%
Poorly correlated
+5.45%
More