GLBZ
Price
$4.00
Change
-$0.03 (-0.74%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
11.6M
KFFB
Price
$3.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
25.88M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLBZ vs KFFB

Header iconGLBZ vs KFFB Comparison
Open Charts GLBZ vs KFFBBanner chart's image
Glen Burnie Ban
Price$4.00
Change-$0.03 (-0.74%)
Volume$4.07K
Capitalization11.6M
Kentucky First Federal Ban
Price$3.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$888
Capitalization25.88M
GLBZ vs KFFB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLBZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KFFB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLBZ vs. KFFB commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLBZ is a Hold and KFFB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (GLBZ: $4.00 vs. KFFB: $3.20)
Brand notoriety: GLBZ and KFFB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLBZ: 36% vs. KFFB: 24%
Market capitalization -- GLBZ: $11.6M vs. KFFB: $25.88M
GLBZ [@Regional Banks] is valued at $11.6M. KFFB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $25.88M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLBZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKFFB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLBZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KFFB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KFFB is a better buy in the long-term than GLBZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLBZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KFFB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLBZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • KFFB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KFFB is a better buy in the short-term than GLBZ.

Price Growth

GLBZ (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.80% price change this week, while KFFB (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KFFB($25.9M) has a higher market cap than GLBZ($11.6M). KFFB YTD gains are higher at: 7.242 vs. GLBZ (-31.339). GLBZ has more cash in the bank: 9.09M vs. KFFB (1.91M). GLBZ has less debt than KFFB: GLBZ (20M) vs KFFB (53.4M). GLBZ has higher revenues than KFFB: GLBZ (11.7M) vs KFFB (8.38M).
GLBZKFFBGLBZ / KFFB
Capitalization11.6M25.9M45%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-31.3397.242-433%
P/E Ratio399.95N/A-
Revenue11.7M8.38M140%
Total Cash9.09M1.91M477%
Total Debt20M53.4M37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLBZ vs KFFB: Fundamental Ratings
GLBZ
KFFB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5096
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8890
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8847
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
19
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KFFB's Valuation (96) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as GLBZ (98) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KFFB’s stock grew similarly to GLBZ’s over the last 12 months.

KFFB's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as GLBZ (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KFFB’s stock grew similarly to GLBZ’s over the last 12 months.

GLBZ's SMR Rating (88) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as KFFB (90) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that GLBZ’s stock grew similarly to KFFB’s over the last 12 months.

KFFB's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLBZ (88) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KFFB’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLBZ’s over the last 12 months.

GLBZ's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as KFFB (9) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that GLBZ’s stock grew similarly to KFFB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLBZKFFB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLBZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KFFB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GAIA5.400.52
+10.66%
Gaia
GRND16.570.24
+1.47%
Grindr
PINS35.78-0.57
-1.57%
Pinterest
GDYN7.70-0.29
-3.63%
Grid Dynamics Holdings
WATT7.71-0.38
-4.70%
Energous Corporation

GLBZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLBZ and PBBK have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLBZ and PBBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLBZ
1D Price
Change %
GLBZ100%
-0.84%
PBBK - GLBZ
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSEA - GLBZ
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
KFFB - GLBZ
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JMSB - GLBZ
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.66%
FLG - GLBZ
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
More

KFFB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KFFB and CFBK have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KFFB and CFBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KFFB
1D Price
Change %
KFFB100%
N/A
CFBK - KFFB
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
CFSB - KFFB
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
OPOF - KFFB
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
FSEA - KFFB
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
ELMA - KFFB
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.65%
More