Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLCCX vs RGACX
GLCCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GLCCX vs RGACX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts C
Price$22.11
Change-$0.07 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.55B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$81.03
Change-$0.02 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.99B
GLCCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLCCX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLCCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. GLCCX (1.55B). RGACX pays higher dividends than GLCCX: RGACX (0.07) vs GLCCX (0.00). GLCCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GLCCX (28 years) vs RGACX (23 years). GLCCX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). GLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 215.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLCCX: RGACX (250) vs GLCCX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.14 vs. GLCCX (4.97). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.49 vs. GLCCX (-33.65).
| GLCCX | RGACX | GLCCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.94 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.94 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.253 | 12.557 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 325B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.97 | 17.14 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.85 | 39.62 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.65 | 40.49 | -83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.42 | 81.90 | 7% |