Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLCCX vs RGACX
GLCCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GLCCX vs RGACX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts C
Price$22.97
Change-$0.23 (-0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.12
Change+$0.43 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
GLCCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLCCX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLCCX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. GLCCX (1.6B). RGACX pays higher dividends than GLCCX: RGACX (0.07) vs GLCCX (0.00). GLCCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GLCCX (28 years) vs RGACX (24 years). GLCCX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). GLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 215.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLCCX: RGACX (250) vs GLCCX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.37 vs. GLCCX (-2.15). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.00 vs. GLCCX (-34.00).
| GLCCX | RGACX | GLCCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.94 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.94 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.186 | 15.460 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.15 | 6.37 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.25 | 61.11 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.00 | 32.00 | -106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.28 | 85.80 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement