Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLCCX vs RGEBX
GLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLCCX vs RGEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts C
Price$22.97
Change-$0.23 (-0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$81.95
Change-$0.57 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
GLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLCCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLCCX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. GLCCX (1.6B). GLCCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . GLCCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: GLCCX (28 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). GLCCX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). GLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 215.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLCCX: RGEBX (250) vs GLCCX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.39 vs. GLCCX (-2.15). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 29.69 vs. GLCCX (-34.00).
| GLCCX | RGEBX | GLCCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.09 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.09 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.186 | 14.712 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 330B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.15 | 6.39 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.25 | 59.35 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.00 | 29.69 | -114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.28 | 80.59 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement