Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLCGX vs RGACX
GLCGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GLCGX vs RGACX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts A
Price$35.51
Change+$0.39 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.61B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.78
Change+$1.08 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
GLCGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLCGX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLCGX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. GLCGX (1.61B). RGACX pays higher dividends than GLCGX: RGACX (0.07) vs GLCGX (0.00). GLCGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GLCGX (28 years) vs RGACX (23 years). GLCGX (0.95) and RGACX (0.94) have similar cost to investors . GLCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 215.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLCGX: RGACX (250) vs GLCGX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.81 vs. GLCGX (6.20). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.72 vs. GLCGX (-11.61).
| GLCGX | RGACX | GLCGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.94 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.94 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.767 | 19.155 | 72% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.61B | 337B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.20 | 11.81 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.60 | 71.33 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.61 | 41.72 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.44 | 95.14 | 59% |